Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I preffer Mirage over Chivalry because Mirage's melee system is a refined version off Chivalry.
Mount and Blade has it's issues. sure. If you however believe that Chivalry devs didn't take any inspiration from M&B, then you should probably ask yourself if you are the mentally challenged one.
J Academy and Rune are even older games which probably wouldn't hold standards today. However, my point was simply that both those games were light years ahead of it's time. And I'm pretty sure Chivalry devs played one or the other at some point.
And I never said anything about where the devs took their inspiration, so your comment is indication that you are, in fact, mentally challenged.