Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
I played PD:TH to death and that's the problem. It peaked. There's good reasons the playerbase all moved on to PD2, even for those of us who still play PD:TH now and then. PD2 has lasted longer and got a bigger player base for all that time. They don't play it because people are forcing them.
There's a lot of features added to PD2 over PD:TH. There's things I like in PD:TH but there's no way I'd want to see PD2 lose everything it has gained in these many years. PD2 also has a much more rewarding grind vs reward feeling. With PD:TH it's pretty slow for very little and you'll be playing those same maps an awful lot. It's a good budget game but as a lower budget game it doesn't have the content and support to last as long.
Trying to hold up PD:TH over PD2 over STEALTH is just silly. PD2 stealth is not perfect but it is far better than PD:TH. More developed mechanics. Properly designed stealth heists. It's no competition for PD:TH in this.
There's a whole crews and clans subforum, discord and other places you can arrange matches. For someone who has played two hours at most they should be learning ropes and arranging a match with someone. Especially if they've played PD:TH much and know how this works.
Complaining about graphics in an OLD GAME and then saying you like the EVEN OLDER game just like it! Come on.
Horde games don't do great AI. Tactical games are more about that with small numbers. This is an action style movie inspired game though and the heroes (or villains) always mow down the dumb opponents by the bucketload when things go loud and that certainly happened in PD:TH as well.
Sorry, first i pinned the comment as the answer but then i couldnt reply, duh, lol.
Just wanted to say THANK YOU so much for your well written reply. I haven't played 1 in at least 5 years, and as i said in a reply to someone else on here, i could be totally wrong in my memory of the first one being smoother due to nostalgia glasses, and just time.
Perhaps my taste in games is just different now. But i will be going back to play the first one for comparison.
I remember loving the stealth in the first one, which is why i was disappointed when it seemed like you cant really do stealth in 2 until you get the right items for it. Again, just from my experience Not stating it as fact (Since apparently i need to clarify that repeatedly)
I didnt check out the mods at all so i definitely missed out on that.
Man, if i'd met people like you that just explained things instead of instantly getting offended and raging.. maybe i would have had more patients with the game.
You could have tried to look for players to add as friends and play with them in the Crews and Clans subforum. That could have maybe reduced the stress and frustration if you were getting tired of getting kicked from public lobbies. But you no longer own the game because you refunded it.
So I took a glance at your other locked thread and you called the devs "dirty". Not wise to say that tbh.
The stealth in the original was provably far simpler and basic. This can be seen from the classic heists that are in PD2 and so it's easy to compare. Original only had two actual stealth heists. PD2 has many. Your claim about the mechanics or "needing" stuff is just odd and not true as PD2 has all the mechanics and more in stealth of PD:TH and if you're playing without all the extra skills and unlocks on an appropriate difficulty then it's going to not be much different to PD:TH which didn't have them anyway.
What stealth heists did you complete? Give us a list and a breakdown.
I mean, i dont really care if people see it as "wise." I was wrong, but its what i thought, so i said it. And yeah, the frustration wasnt worth it to me. Rather have that $1 for many other things than sludge through the community more than i already had.
I did play a couple with just a friend to try and get into it. Just didnt do it for me.
"Maybe if you didn't instantly rage and insult the developers like you did people wouldn't have kicked you from their games" Well.. that's impossible since i made the post after i'd been kicked.. and haven't played the game since.
You dont want to help or explain. You just want to drag my opinion threw the dirt, So i really dont care to reply to you anymore. Have a good day.
"Gunplay is bad" is the level of commentary you've given so far and is a fair opinion to hold if you feel that way but you don't give any info or examples or fixes which makes it pointless and just an excuse to repost your locked very basic review. If you can't give any real analysis or ideas for it then what can be done or what's the point in posting it on a forum? What specific changes would you make to the weapons or the gunplay or mechanics and stats for them? That's what makes a thread good and invites discussion. Not just slandering the devs and making false claims about the game.
Hosting your own games would solve all your kicking claims too instantly and should be obvious as you said you've played PD:TH. It'd let you arrange terms of the heist and learn the ropes with others or solo. Also easy way to learn stealth. Yet somehow that is "no option" for no reason explained once again.
One last reply to you, just cuz you had posted this before and i missed it. Does Overkill want me to apologize? Pretty sure i already said i was wrong> AND corrected it in the post. But you need me to say the words to make you feel better even though what i already said holds the same purpose? lol? Ok.
I am sorry. I was wrong. And I am also sorry i cant edit a locked thread where it says the same thing.
Seemingly obvious goals as stealthing a heist may require a bit of trial and error, asking around on the forums, and playing in the character menu for some time reading up on skills, weapons, stats, and other loadout mechanics.
It’s not the most friendly of games when it comes to starting out, and the game’s tutorial is pretty terrible (another consequence of a later added feature years after the game’s release).
Personally I recommend giving the game a little more than a couple hours to learn before making a review, however I will accept this game certainly isn’t liked by everyone because it absolutely has performance, optimization, and bug issues. Most of us veterans have learned to accept that as a part of our quirky little game, but they are blemishes on the quality.
To be fair to OP the Steam time limit is way too short for many games and that can lead people to making rash judgements of games. Can you imagine trying to learn all about PD2 in UNDER two hours? Or some grand strategy game where the tutorials would take longer than that? It's not a good time span. PD2 takes time to appreciate.
I am so conflicted, you rage nearly the whole time then you come out with THIS reply. LMAO. To reply or not to reply, welp, gonna go back on my word here and reply because this is actually a reply and not just butthurt.
See, THIS, is exactly the kind of reply i was looking for, minus the first paragraph for the most part.
DLC being mandatory i elaborate on more in that same post saying its mostly due to the community, leaving the Devs out of it completely mind you. And agin, this is from my experience with the community in game behaving pretty much the way you did for most of this post.
Gunplay, You're right, i didnt give examples of how to improve it. I'm no expert. And i cant tell you what needs to be adjusted stat wise. But it doesnt feel good. Feels low budget, which it is. And i even said its normal for a low budget game, so i'm not sure why you have a problem with that. Now an example, albeit a bad one, would be Warzone. A free game with far superior gun handling/ gunplay. Again, a BAD example as Warzone is made by a AAA title company. But im just trying to explain the difference in the gunplay as i experienced it. Again, i'm no expert. Never claimed to be. Never claimed to know a lot about the game. Just wanted to know what people liked about it over 1 since i remember loving 1 but just could not get into this one at all.
Like i said to someone else the replied, perhaps my taste in games just changed since then. Or maybe i just preferred the simpler play style, not really sure. And this could have been a lovely conversation. Was i wrong about the Devs, totes. And i've corrected that, as stated like.... 5 times now? But you came in like a bad outa hell trying to put me down for wanting to keep $1, lol, you just behaved like the majority of people in this game and prove my point about the community.
" "lol its poop and you're all lame". "
I literally said " this is my opinion, i'm not insulting you or insinuating anything about you if you like the game" in the opening post.
So again, not what i did or said.
You wanna teach me without being a ♥♥♥♥ about it? Cuz i'm down to learn. But for now i'll enjoy my tacos.
Yeah, the first one seemed much more intuitive> Simpler, as it seems, but more intuitive. I never had to pull up a forum to learn to play the first one so i wasnt expecting it with this one. Obviously, this game is a different beast. Just not a beast i could get into. Maybe i just enjoyed the simplicity of the first one, idk.