Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
BAR M1918 (it was an automatic rifle that was used as an LMG by the US forces, but i think it should be added as a rifle to the game, have good stability and excellent hipfire accuracy since it was specifically designed for marching fire and have the same damage as the ak.762, but have a slow firerate of 500 and a mag size of 20 as a tradeoff)
M1919 (like the BAR, will have high damage and very slow rate of fire, only this one will obviously be an lmg and have horrendous, even for an lmg, hipfire accuracy and stability, making bipods a requirement)
And to make a suggestion for the M1 Carbine (assuming any of this will actually be taken into consideration, yes?), it can be a secondary considering that it's original purpose was to be a backup weapon for tank drivers because of it's compact design, it can be a medium tier weapon in the SMG cathegory, while we still have guns like the krinkov (AKU) and CR805 (based on the CZ805, a carbine) in there as well.
-Lee Enfield Rifles (One in-game rifle that can be modded into multiple versions of the Lee Enfield Rifles)
-M1/M2 Carbine
-Webley–Fosbery Automatic Revolver
-Bren Gun
-Browning Automatic Rifle (With mods to make it into the HCAR)
-SVT/AVT
-PPSH-41/PPS
-Winchester M1895 Russian contract
-Nagant M1910 Revolver
As for Melee weapons, how about the Nambu Pistoltana?
http://66.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lz4053YHvg1r9khx4o1_1280.jpg
oh wait the Martini-Henry breech loading gun is one of my favs in bf1, so this sounds like a good gun for pd2
The Mosin may be not as smooth as other bolt-actions but it is nowhere near as bad as you make it out to be. There is a lot wrong with what you said about British marksmanship; British soldiers were trained to fire at least 15 well aimed shoots in one minute with the Lee–Enfield, volley fire fall out of favour when the Lee–Enfield rifle was introduced, if you could not aim for crap you could not join as the British Army is a professional army that was famous for having the world’s finest marksmen and that post Boer War marksmanship is nowhere near that of the Napoleonic or Middle Ages marksmanship, the biggest differences being is that soldier were trained to aim at a single man instead of the line of men.
And yeah we need a lot more weapons from WW2 around
Volley fire may have fell out of favor, but the British never really had a culture for marksmanship. British soldiers were largely, like every other nation, conscripts. The over-large professional army (which admittedly could aim) they fielded to oppress their colonies was for the most part, wiped out. The Japanese took their holdings in Asia, The nazis sweeped straight through those in Europe. Americans had more ammo to train their troops, and were training men who were often familiar with guns to begin with. It really isn't a contest.
Anyways.
-Browning Auto-5 (The First Semiauto Shotgun)
-Stg44 (The first "Assault" rifle)
-BAR (The first SAW)
-Panzerfaust
-Bazooka
-Arisaka Type 38 (Only Japanese weapon worth mentioning. Besides the Nambu Gunblade which is just adorable).
The British people trained marksmanship on mass since the middle ages in-till the inter war years for both cultural and legal reasons, the British regular army was never wiped out, only forced to take on conscripts to boost their numbers because a vastly outnumbered/outgunned army can’t win no matter how good they are. The loses in Asia were due to bad planning not how they fought (The US did not do that well in the early years of their war against Japanese either), the British was only 10 percent of the Allied force which was outflanked by the Germans and were unable to move fast enough counter German tactics. The Americans were almost crushed in North African Campaign due to inexperience and poor leadership, were as the British Army were able win multiple battles during the campaign.
And a De Lisle Carbine, because we need more internally silenced weapons.