Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
You don't generally see Sundies used in the AA role because large concentrations of enemy air units are rare, and when they do appear the Skyguard presents a more immediate solution to the problem (don't have to rendezvous with gunners and slowly get your sundy into position).
The Lightning is absolutely the more maneuverable pick, though. I'm just wondering, pound for pound, what puts out more AA damage, the Skyguard or the Walker.
gal with walker/ bulldog for esf
tankbuster/dalton for anti-lib duties
combine arms my ass
Stop playing dumb and stop your usual PS1 derailing shenanigans.
And stop trying to play dumb already.
I'm still missing half my Burster timings(decided to add it halfway through), and most of my ESF timings; but I CAN go ahead and point out something interesting.
The Skyguard is extremely effective against EVERYTHING, -=/IF YOU CAN HIT IT\=-.
Sounds easy enough, but between the kick and the cone-of-fire for the skyguard(Why does a dedicated weapons platform like the lighting HAVE a kick for the skyguard, I mean really ./whine) it's widly inaccurate against even perfectly still targets(VR targets). At least half my Skyguard shots were missing even when my sight was deadcenter at the 400m~ range, but of course you're not really supposed to USe it at 400m, right? :|
However, while is one-three seconds slower(on average) against the same targets, it is FAR more user friendly. No kick, faster projectile speed so less leading required(against moving targets), and FAR less CoF. At 400m against a Valk, you MIGHT miss 1/5(probably less) of shots on a stationary target due to CoF, versus the almost half+ when using the Skyguard.
The Ranger on the other hand? Completly useless. Slowest at everything, insane kick, disgusting cone of fire. I couldn't even kill a Valkyrie with /FULL AMMO/(including all the extra ammo certs) from the Ranger at 400m, simply because 90% of the shots were missing. I'm sure I'll hafta toss out the 400m ESF test as well, but anyway.
TO SUMMERIZE THUS FAR:
Do you have a buddy running with you? Grab a dual-walker Sundie and wipe the slate clean.
Running solo? Skyguard is probably best. (I think I still perfer walker-sundie myself, but I'm terribad at using a Skyguard so).
Personally I hate using them, but I am told those are the advantages to the ranger.
Right, but the problem is even in a BEST CASE secanrio, the Ranger is 100% worthless at range. Lets say an ESF manages to fly perfectly such that ALL of your ranger shots hit it. In the same amount of time it takes for you to kill that ESF, the Walker will have killed 1.75-2 ESFs, depending on the actual range.