PlanetSide 2

PlanetSide 2

Pititan Aug 12, 2018 @ 9:13pm
Can I run this
A bit of an old game I know, but I've always tried playing this on bad hardware...but no I've gotten a decent PC..
I5
12gb ram
Uhd 630
2.8 GHz
Not the best but it's an old game I should run it on playable fps, right?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 15 comments
rookie Aug 12, 2018 @ 11:44pm 
What's a Uhd 630? Anyway this game is known to be very, very demanding on pc's. Your cpu should be OK but the gpu maybe not.
Kopo6o4ka_2 Aug 13, 2018 @ 2:33am 
uhd 630 - integrated graphics, not acceptable for this game. You need at least 1050ti to be competitive there in large battles.
SomeBaldGuy Aug 13, 2018 @ 2:39am 
I run a gtx960 strix and get fps of around 38-46 in large battles, not great but playable. I tend to stay on the outskirts for that reason.
Iggy Aug 13, 2018 @ 8:00am 
This game is processor intensive as opposed to graphics intensive, rendering all those 200+ people close to you isn't easy. Your i5 might be able to do it but I would recommend potatoing up your settings and going from there.

http://iridar.net/planetside2/performance-guide/
There's a settings .ini there for potato about 1/3 the way down that you might want to try out. If you get good fps, check out the new player stuff on that website for a helping hand.
Last edited by Iggy; Aug 13, 2018 @ 8:00am
Alan Aug 13, 2018 @ 3:07pm 
Originally posted by pititan:
A bit of an old game I know, but I've always tried playing this on bad hardware...but no I've gotten a decent PC..
I5
12gb ram
Uhd 630
2.8 GHz
Not the best but it's an old game I should run it on playable fps, right?


Nope - You need a powerful rig to run this game,CPU and GPU due to the scale of the fights, the numbers ect.
Pititan Aug 13, 2018 @ 4:01pm 
That's where your all wrong kiddos....turned it to potato mode, was getting roughly 40 fps in a squad while in a building with around 20 ppl in it...it was chaos... explosions everywhere and dudes dyin all over the place... But it was great...
Akboris Aug 13, 2018 @ 6:10pm 
No you cant. You shouldnt really expect to play any PC game without a dedicated graphics card.
Smaug's Arrow. Aug 13, 2018 @ 6:16pm 
Integrated. I dont know, would be bad like 15 fps bad. And would destroy your MB 2 months tops.

I had 2 aging 6770s in crossfire changed em out for the xfx rx550 4gb it was like 80usd at best buy. It uses a *14 nm die process and really its paid for it self since december. Its out performed those 2 cards and saved me money to boot!

Consider this advice.
Akboris Aug 13, 2018 @ 7:47pm 
'Consider this advice'
Pititan Aug 13, 2018 @ 8:20pm 
Originally posted by Jason Bateman:
Integrated. I dont know, would be bad like 15 fps bad. And would destroy your MB 2 months tops.

I had 2 aging 6770s in crossfire changed em out for the xfx rx550 4gb it was like 80usd at best buy. It uses a *14 nm die process and really its paid for it self since december. Its out performed those 2 cards and saved me money to boot!

Consider this advice.
Yeah..I bought it for some casual gaming... And thus far, Planetside is the most demanding game I have... And while it does run decently well even in big battles... I worry that it could speed up deterioration or just burn it...

I was actually surprised with the way the PC ran the game.. I was playing while there was an event on indar and I was part of a 10(or maybe more, I don't remember) man squad (randoms) and we were actually on a stalemate in which my faction (conglomerate) couldn't break through the republic defences and we were actually locked in a building...planes and ♥♥♥♥ were free so there were tanks and infantry storming the ground while air battles were happening in the air... I was so indulged that I played for 2 hours and didn't even feel it... Through all of this I was getting about 30-45 fps, and 20 fps when ♥♥♥♥ got real...
Smaug's Arrow. Aug 13, 2018 @ 8:53pm 
Originally posted by pititan:
Originally posted by Jason Bateman:
Integrated. I dont know, would be bad like 15 fps bad. And would destroy your MB 2 months tops.

I had 2 aging 6770s in crossfire changed em out for the xfx rx550 4gb it was like 80usd at best buy. It uses a *14 nm die process and really its paid for it self since december. Its out performed those 2 cards and saved me money to boot!

Consider this advice.
Yeah..I bought it for some casual gaming... And thus far, Planetside is the most demanding game I have... And while it does run decently well even in big battles... I worry that it could speed up deterioration or just burn it...

I was actually surprised with the way the PC ran the game.. I was playing while there was an event on indar and I was part of a 10(or maybe more, I don't remember) man squad (randoms) and we were actually on a stalemate in which my faction (conglomerate) couldn't break through the republic defences and we were actually locked in a building...planes and ♥♥♥♥ were free so there were tanks and infantry storming the ground while air battles were happening in the air... I was so indulged that I played for 2 hours and didn't even feel it... Through all of this I was getting about 30-45 fps, and 20 fps when ♥♥♥♥ got real...


My thoughts are that your integrated video either has a small passive heatsink or nothing at all.
That means that your MB is tanking that heat from the chip and also the voltage demands from the chip. I wouldnt risk it, even if it has solid caps.
Alan Aug 14, 2018 @ 5:58am 
Haha - At any rate, anything over 24+ battles, you will struggle with. Much of the game is built around your CPU clocking up to 400 players at one time. Not a chance with thses specs. Either way, it would look like real. bad. Well

Maybe save for a half decent rig. Even a 970 with an intel CPU should run it fine with tweaked settings.
Last edited by Alan; Aug 14, 2018 @ 5:58am
Smaug's Arrow. Aug 14, 2018 @ 12:49pm 
Originally posted by Creativeworks:
Haha - At any rate, anything over 24+ battles, you will struggle with. Much of the game is built around your CPU clocking up to 400 players at one time. Not a chance with thses specs. Either way, it would look like real. bad. Well

Maybe save for a half decent rig. Even a 970 with an intel CPU should run it fine with tweaked settings.

the bit coin miners dream.
DedZedNub Aug 15, 2018 @ 8:21pm 
The CPU should be able to handle it, overall. You have enough RAM, also.

The CPU's clockspeed is a tad slower than you want, 3.4k handles it okay as an older i5.

Your video is killing you. I don't think any or very few integrated CPUs can handle PS2.

The issues are compounded by several key things in PS2:

1) When you use Integrated Video, you are using up your extra RAM for the video memory.

2) When you use Integrated Video, the CPU is still handling much of the Video work, at least for swapping things in and out of memory, this further taxes and slows down the effectiveness of your CPU for the CPU heavy stuff of PS2.

3) The CPU needs to track a ton of info on various users, handle memory well, and so on. So you get a double whammy when your Integrated Video gets slow, it is working the CPU a lot, which makes it slow down in doing the CPU heavy tasks in a large battle.

Large Battles are going to do you in. I used to use Intel HD integrated video on almost every game. There were 2 key games that made it impossible. Dying Light 2 and Planetside 2.

I now use an Nvidia Geforce 750 Ti with 2 MB of VRAM and it can handle it fine, overall.

It also pays to customize your video settings. I'm not going to go into that for PS2, it is an odd duck, and there are tons of recommended settings online. What I will say is that you should REMEMBER that PS2 looks just as good and often works better in large battles with lowered options, rather than HIGH or ULTRA. If you want to see things at long render range, and want to compete in larger battles, there is no reason for chrome that you will never notice in the frenzy of battle (or for that matter, is annoying anyway, like various blurs. You blur just spinning around for targets, who needs fake blur on top of that?)

Perhaps a good starting point is http://iridar.net/planetside2/

Another good video component is anything by CyriousGaming on PS2.

There was a post by a former Dev that had also good points on customizing PS2 options, I believe that is referenced on iridar.net as well. Plus several YouTube videos if needed on the subject. Just remember for many PS2 fans, less is more and better gameplay.

If you get a video card, you can get what you decide, but anything by Nvidia is usually a better choice for compatibility with most games. I believe the 1050 Ti recommended by someone above is basically the more modern improved 750 Ti. It also will not require more than 1 slot usually to install and usually requires a very modest power supply, so you won't get as hot in your room if you have no A/C -- which also means your computer stays alive with poor fans and dust -- a winning choice.

Now, I don't play at 1920x 1080, but I'm sure I could. I have a 32 inch LCD TV that I use about 2-3 feet from me, so anything 1360x768 or larger looks big enough to surround my eyeballs with graphics, and I usually run it at 1440x900.

So here's a tip. If you don't play from across the room, why not get a bigger TV on the cheap, say 32 inch or more -- not have more than 1920x1080 resolution, and save money for quality video card in future. The benefit is, with all the pixels up close and squished to closer proximity, you can still see the pores on your favorite avatar looking great, but you don't have to worry about pumping out 4K video at 120 Hz, and frying in the middle of the summer.

My monitor was by Sceptre, cheap and had good reviews. LED/LCD TV/Monitors are pretty much a commodity now, so unless you need the very high end for special tasks (like 4k nonsense), get something reasonable, use it closer to you when you play, and save the moolah and electricity for more important things (um, like games? No shh, maybe)

You dig? And your electric bill will be your new friend.
Last edited by DedZedNub; Aug 15, 2018 @ 8:26pm
Fishpoke Aug 16, 2018 @ 9:33am 
Originally posted by pititan:
A bit of an old game I know, but I've always tried playing this on bad hardware...but no I've gotten a decent PC..
I5
12gb ram
Uhd 630
2.8 GHz
Not the best but it's an old game I should run it on playable fps, right?

Uhm you can run it but don't expect great FPS when the fight gets busy.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 15 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Aug 12, 2018 @ 9:13pm
Posts: 15