Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I do believe Veteran legionaries have higher morale. which can be used as a good holding force if you are planning on focusing on ranged/mounted troops
Legionaries and Legonary Cohorts are supposed to represent the shift from Republican Marian Legions to Imperial Legions - namely in the appearance of some soldiers wearing the lorica segmentata. Armored Legionaries then are just those Legionary Cohorts with better defense/armor stats and visually speaking all of the soldiers wear the segmentata.
You may as well forgo them for armored cohorts. They have even better armor than the legionary cohorts and don't suffer any damage degredation for only a modest increase in price and upkeep.
This happens to many roman units i.e legionnary cohort vs eagle cohort. Either the stats are not true or they are badly explained.