Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
Diskussionsregler og retningslinjer
Rapporter dette indlæg
This goes towards my opinion that the game is good but not great. Adding a region system, while breaking the concept of city managment, does give you a stronger way to improve your economy. However, the economy is irrelevant by the CA's own admission which is why you don't really build anything you just select upgradable buildings that act more like support cards for magic or pokemon rather than truely unique structures.
People can't play the game. That's why they are here, whining. Otherwise they would be playing the game.
as I said:
read posts before replying, thanks
Its like they didn't do any beta testing and left that job to use to save money
Agreed, especially when they've shelled out £35 for a bug ridden game.
The last three titles from this series have all been released too early. They are betting on gameplay feed back they get from our PC's as we play.
Is little % buffs to your infantry or skirmishers or whatever what you would call 'character' ? This feature was much touted and hyped up when all it is is just a simple level-up system, grand.
I'd rather have "100s of AI units" thrown at me if it constitutes a challenge rather than passive AI that waits for me to fight them - but this has been a feature of every TW game, so whatever.
How is this a new thing ? You always moved your production centres forward unless you wanted fresh armies to spend years getting to the frontier; as for the economy, mods for Rome 1 have done it just as well if not better/more interesting many years ago.
I can give you this one, but as much as having these options is cool, it's pretty pointless when they're not needed and brute force works just fine.
You mean like the Legion customization ? Adding +1 of this or that stat is not serious customization.. once again, Europa Barbarorum, Rome: Total Realism, Roma Surr ectum 2.5, and other mods add tons and tons of traits that make Generals unique, interesting and, perhaps most importantly, people you might, just might, CARE for, rather than automatons that you add +1 to.
A shinier coat of paint does not make a better game. Game devs like to flash prettier graphics in your face and convince you that the game is better because of it - Never. Gameplay and depth always trumps looks.
There will come a day when the standard for graphics is so high, that devs will no longer be able to impress with fidelity, and might have to for once, just once, compete with eachother in the gameplay arena rather than in the "oouh, shiny ! " one.
False. Go ask any modder and they will tell you that TW games are getting harder and harder to mod. CA is not Bohemia or Bethesda, they do not go hardcore on the mod support, not anymore.
Just go look at how Rome or MTW2 was modded and then look at mods for Empire. Yeah.
As for the rest of your post - you dismiss criticism as "whining" and "trolling" - if you want your games to improve, you need to criticise and punish (by not buying) companies. They are not your friends. You are only a customer. Act like one.
I suspect that in about a year we will get the game we paid for. Not till then, think where you were a year after Shogun 2 had its bugs worked out.
Well I agree, we need to come with criticism, but so far, 90% have been whining, and raging on the forum... which is why there is so many pages!! (I think I saw 400+)...
Sure we need to say what we want to get changed, but there is a difference, if people had unreal expectations and just feels let down, or if they give the game a chance, experience problems and then report it...
and of cause the people that can't open the game... my thoughts go out to all you people, I been there with several games, and it sucks.
I am currently playing on my 40th turn and the game say I been playing 44 hours... I feel that people that put in time and actually played the game should be heard, and the rest should get the posts deleted, as all they do is use space on the forum...