NO WALLS and flimsy excuses

[SirJonC]

can you please give syacuse and jerusalem its walles back and dont give me the crap "it will break game saves" is irelavent when it will give the game more authenticity and a more histoic feel i just cant even be bothered to play rome even the emporer edition thats coming out because of major cities that had walls not having it "because it will break game saves" is nothing but bs and laziness to the title.....and maybe say a week or so before this say it will break saves so if you want to finish them dont dowload this so and so patch its not even that difficult for you guys to even do (even though i was ♥♥♥♥ed off you couldnt be bothered to make syacuse walls from history in HatG but better than no walls i guess -_-) serisoly sycuse should of been its own island with 2 cities and main city to begin with and the fact jeruslam has no walls is just as agravating im sorry i just cant play this game becuase of cowaduse to improve the main feel of the main campaign "because it will brake game saves" is no excuse and just makes you a bad developer ps you have already brocken several of my saves with patches (and thats with 0 mods) so that invalidates your so called "it will brake saves" excuse.
Sorry bs statements like "it will break saves" when you have already done so in the past just ♥♥♥♥es me off when you can improve the main stay of the serise with more towns and cities when i first heard of this rome 2 was coming out i enfualed by seeing (and seiging :P) the many great cities of the anceint world (if you can put londinuim in the game you can put jeruslam and syacuse in) serisly why the ♥♥♥♥ did you exclude 2 of the great walled cities in the anceint world in game (serisly the emperor edition is when you should of released rome 2) it just boggles my mind that someone would say "hay lets exclude 2 of the ancient worlds most formidly cities" it just incomprehensable to me. ps sorry for mispells abit tired

[Cxbo]

SirJonC eredeti hozzászólása:

can you please give syacuse and jerusalem its walles back and dont give me the crap "it will break game saves" is irelavent when it will give the game more authenticity and a more histoic feel i just cant even be bothered to play rome even the emporer edition thats coming out because of major cities that had walls not having it "because it will break game saves" is nothing but bs and laziness to the title.....and maybe say a week or so before this say it will break saves so if you want to finish them dont dowload this so and so patch its not even that difficult for you guys to even do (even though i was ♥♥♥♥ed off you couldnt be bothered to make syacuse walls from history in HatG but better than no walls i guess -_-) serisoly sycuse should of been its own island with 2 cities and main city to begin with and the fact jeruslam has no walls is just as agravating im sorry i just cant play this game becuase of cowaduse to improve the main feel of the main campaign "because it will brake game saves" is no excuse and just makes you a bad developer ps you have already brocken several of my saves with patches (and thats with 0 mods) so that invalidates your so called "it will brake saves" excuse.
Sorry bs statements like "it will break saves" when you have already done so in the past just ♥♥♥♥es me off when you can improve the main stay of the serise with more towns and cities when i first heard of this rome 2 was coming out i enfualed by seeing (and seiging :P) the many great cities of the anceint world (if you can put londinuim in the game you can put jeruslam and syacuse in) serisly why the ♥♥♥♥ did you exclude 2 of the great walled cities in the anceint world in game (serisly the emperor edition is when you should of released rome 2) it just boggles my mind that someone would say "hay lets exclude 2 of the ancient worlds most formidly cities" it just incomprehensable to me. ps sorry for mispells abit tired

Sorry, ya wee lad, but I'd say around 97% of cities didn't have walls. Do you realize that? No? Well damn, why did I? Maybe because I'm not an annoying, ignorant fool that wants everything handed to them, now, now now! Calm your butt down and be patient. If you won't play a game because some cities don't have walls, then don't play at all. Just quit complaining and leave.

[Sir Hornet]

i dont think them having walls will make much diffrence to historic or authenticity. yeah the excuses are flimsy but whats done is done

[SirJonC]

"Sorry, ya wee lad, but I'd say around 97% of cities didn't have walls. Do you realize that? No? Well damn, why did I? Maybe because I'm not an annoying, ignorant fool that wants everything handed to them, now, now now! Calm your butt down and be patient. If you won't play a game because some cities don't have walls, then don't play at all. Just quit complaining and leave."
Yep ignorant troll trying to bait me syacuse and jeruslem had walls at the time of the campaign starts and maybe if you werent ignorant you would know that both the romans and carthage couldnt conqour sycuse due its massive walls and defensies well they did have one of the most brilient minds helping them as well (archaimedes) and the walls of jeruslem caused real problems for the romans as well of course they eventually fell but not after defeating sevral armies sent to capture them with disastrouse defeats (rome tryed blocading and seiging sycuse at the same time and still couldnt succeed) sigh ♥♥♥♥ off if you want to be a peice of ignorant ♥♥♥♥ not discussing like a capable human being. just quit complaing and leave.

[Dick the Ripper]

Theres a mod that does exactly what you ask... Try looking first instead of raging sometimes.

[SirJonC]

......so we cant have a discusion about it, ps wouldnt mind telling me the name of that mod pls :P
tbh im more pissed about the bs and flimsy excuse they gave but still they have added cities in the mini campaign like syacuse and jeruslim but still i would of expected an update to the main campain as well instead of them saying flimsy excuses

[jtordoff]

Jerusalam had walls at many times in her history as early as 800 ish BC and Syracuse had fortifications as well. The lack of walls and the ability to build and upgrade walls is just plain lazy on the part of the Developers. Many of the things "wrong" with the game are products of laziness/cheapness of the producers of this game.

As much as I appreciate the hard work of the modding community, that doesn't give the Devs a pass or sheild them from criticism. The OP is a paying customer and has a right to complain about a substandard product.

[SJWs R TRAITORS]

Waffle Trolley eredeti hozzászólása:

SirJonC eredeti hozzászólása:

can you please give syacuse and jerusalem its walles back and dont give me the crap "it will break game saves" is irelavent when it will give the game more authenticity and a more histoic feel i just cant even be bothered to play rome even the emporer edition thats coming out because of major cities that had walls not having it "because it will break game saves" is nothing but bs and laziness to the title.....and maybe say a week or so before this say it will break saves so if you want to finish them dont dowload this so and so patch its not even that difficult for you guys to even do (even though i was ♥♥♥♥ed off you couldnt be bothered to make syacuse walls from history in HatG but better than no walls i guess -_-) serisoly sycuse should of been its own island with 2 cities and main city to begin with and the fact jeruslam has no walls is just as agravating im sorry i just cant play this game becuase of cowaduse to improve the main feel of the main campaign "because it will brake game saves" is no excuse and just makes you a bad developer ps you have already brocken several of my saves with patches (and thats with 0 mods) so that invalidates your so called "it will brake saves" excuse.
Sorry bs statements like "it will break saves" when you have already done so in the past just ♥♥♥♥es me off when you can improve the main stay of the serise with more towns and cities when i first heard of this rome 2 was coming out i enfualed by seeing (and seiging :P) the many great cities of the anceint world (if you can put londinuim in the game you can put jeruslam and syacuse in) serisly why the ♥♥♥♥ did you exclude 2 of the great walled cities in the anceint world in game (serisly the emperor edition is when you should of released rome 2) it just boggles my mind that someone would say "hay lets exclude 2 of the ancient worlds most formidly cities" it just incomprehensable to me. ps sorry for mispells abit tired

Sorry, ya wee lad, but I'd say around 97% of cities didn't have walls. Do you realize that? No? Well damn, why did I? Maybe because I'm not an annoying, ignorant fool that wants everything handed to them, now, now now! Calm your butt down and be patient. If you won't play a game because some cities don't have walls, then don't play at all. Just quit complaining and leave.

WRONG! in 200 BCE many large / main settlements had walls or some kind of defenses, when enemies are close, you'd be stupid not to have defenses. BUT CA designers have 200 AD in mind when Rome ruled the world.

[l33tness08]

Oh goodie I love threads like this.

I firmly believe that this is purely a gameplay decision. Jerusalem is in a region with another capital city, and so is Syracuse. It would make it horrendously unbalanced to have two walled cities in a region. Yeah it might make it historically accurate but Jesus Christ, it's not a deal breaker to freak out over and say you can't play the game. That's an overreaction. It's like going to an italian restaurant and ordering some bolognese, but when it comes without bread on the side you flip out and cause a scene.

[Spud]

just another example of lazy game design and the excuse is pure CA.

[l33tness08]

I don't get the "lazy" excuse... I think it's pretty obviously a concious decision...

[Mile pro Libertate]

jtordoff eredeti hozzászólása:

Jerusalam had walls at many times in her history as early as 800 ish BC and Syracuse had fortifications as well. The lack of walls and the ability to build and upgrade walls is just plain lazy on the part of the Developers. Many of the things "wrong" with the game are products of laziness/cheapness of the producers of this game.

As much as I appreciate the hard work of the modding community, that doesn't give the Devs a pass or sheild them from criticism. The OP is a paying customer and has a right to complain about a substandard product.

I recently watched a let's play video by DarrenTotalWar where he plays the Emperor Edition.

He and others have noted some changes:

1) All minor settlements can now build "palisades". It's not as strong or extensive as a full blown city wall, but it surrounds the town with a basic wall. Think original RTW and the minor settlements.

2) Sicily has been further subdivied into 3 regions now: Syracuse now has city walls.

3) Judea has been redone; Jerusalem will be more developed in Emperor Augusuts campaign and have its own faction.

[Surg3on]

Waffle Trolley eredeti hozzászólása:

SirJonC eredeti hozzászólása:

Whiiiiiiine by OP

Sorry, ya wee lad, but I'd say around 97% of cities didn't have walls. Do you realize that? No? Well damn, why did I? Maybe because I'm not an annoying, ignorant fool that wants everything handed to them, now, now now! Calm your butt down and be patient. If you won't play a game because some cities don't have walls, then don't play at all. Just quit complaining and leave.

Going to have to agree!

[Migz - DH]

Mile pro Libertate eredeti hozzászólása:

Jerusalem will be more developed in Emperor Augusuts campaign and have its own faction.

Not a playable faction though.

This[wiki.totalwar.com] lists all of the playable factions.

[LeadStarDude]

Migz - DH eredeti hozzászólása:

Mile pro Libertate eredeti hozzászólása:

Jerusalem will be more developed in Emperor Augusuts campaign and have its own faction.

Not a playable faction though.

Well not yet anyway... ;)

[Migz - DH]

Perhaps. But, CA hasn't advertised Judea as a playable faction thus far.