Rome 2 or napoleon total war?

[Braskill5]

I love napoleonic wars, but I already own Empire so It will be a bit equal, and rome seens a more refined game, but I dont have that mega interest at antiguty and ITS a hard game, and napoleonic wars is more advanced kinda at modern age we dont have naked fanatics and Head hurlers lmao. I woulda try Rome or stay with napo? I am new até total war also

[TheOrangeBox]

Napoleon is a better version of Empire by a fair bit of a stretch, so is definitely a game to have in your library if you love the Napoleonic wars.

Rome II isn't a refined version of Empire, it introduces new changes so kinda become a new start in the TW series.

[BRAN MAC BORN]

Napoleon with mods.

[Stinkyremy]

Honestly, with TW just go with the period settings you like best.
I personally prefer rome and I dont like guns in TW games. That is my own preference.

[coffeemm8]

Originally posted by Stinkyremy:

Honestly, with TW just go with the period settings you like best.
I personally prefer rome and I dont like guns in TW games. That is my own preference.

I’m the same, with the exception of Shogun 2 FOTS

[Able]

Originally posted by Braskill5:

I love napoleonic wars, but I already own Empire so It will be a bit equal, and rome seens a more refined game, but I dont have that mega interest at antiguty and ITS a hard game, and napoleonic wars is more advanced kinda at modern age we dont have naked fanatics and Head hurlers lmao. I woulda try Rome or stay with napo? I am new até total war also

Originally posted by TheOrangeBox:

Napoleon is a better version of Empire by a fair bit of a stretch, so is definitely a game to have in your library if you love the Napoleonic wars.

Rome II isn't a refined version of Empire, it introduces new changes so kinda become a new start in the TW series.

Rome II built upon some things introduced in Shogun 2, which in turn built upon Napoleon and Napoleon upon Empire. Shogun 2 is the last total war in the series we see as the old games, with a lot of the older systems in play but a lot of newer things also added in. Rome II is a buildup of a newer system with less of the older systems in place, making what Orange said to be true, Rome II is the beginning of a new era that later titles built upon.

[Napolitain]

Rome 2 is better objectively

[sethiepotter]

You see napoleon was my first total war game and i use it with darthmod. HOWEVER I honestly perfer empire (only with the empire 2 mod) and fots as I feel like napoleon was kinda shortchanged with the smaller map and removal of new towns popping up.

[Braskill5]

Nvm

[Braskill5]

I bougt Rome 2 and its cool

[Braskill5]

A shame that 40% of the game depend of DLC

[TheOrangeBox]

Originally posted by Braskill5:

A shame that 40% of the game depend of DLC

lol! WUT?

[Braskill5]

Originally posted by TheOrangeBox:

Originally posted by Braskill5:

A shame that 40% of the game depend of DLC

lol! WUT?

Yeah kinda, the game feels a bit empty without DLCs

[Braskill5]

Also, what the point of playing with greek city states, i mean, Athens is Just stuck with their neighboors

[coffeemm8]

The DLCs are just side campaigns as far as I know.

They don’t enhance the grand campaign which is the meat of the game

[Braskill5]

Originally posted by coffeemm8:

The DLCs are just side campaigns as far as I know.

They don’t enhance the grand campaign which is the meat of the game

Lol no