Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not the best idea to raid a settlement you intent to occupy in short order. The effects of raiding will be felt in that settlement for a few turns I believe.
Alternatively, if the army leaves the settlement but stays within reinforcement range, a good trick is to besiege the settlement with a token force (a solo general will do the trick) and maintain the siege while your main army attacks theirs. This will prevent the settlement garrison from reinforcing. When you have dealt with their army, you can then withdraw your solo general and safely besiege the settlement with your main force.
Attack the army in a field battle, then lay siege to the city.
You do realize that's the whole point of the game? They were as powerful in real life and the challenge of outflanking them and overcoming them was what the wars were about. Looks like historical play is not your thing.
Lol he doesn’t know Pikes were OP in real life....