Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's possible, just way easier with a gamepad.
You're probably right :)
Also I relaunched the game and the gold medals show up now when you 100% an area. Weird :)
I bought the game thinking I'd be able to play with my steam friends when I read in the store that one of the features this game had was "MULTIPLAYER". But I guess that's my own fault for expecting good things to happen, EVER.
Also, full keyboard support, steam feature? You forego the most important thing like multiplayer for a """steam feature""" like full keyboard support? You kid me.
If you "concentrated on adding as many steam features as possible", wouldn't it be completely logical to focus on adding the most important steam feature of all, MULTIPLAYER, into the game?
While the game *IS* good, I just can't justify the purchase now because I can't play it with my friends online. Not every single one of my friends lives close enough so we can play this game together. I wish I would have pirated this.
Thanks Drinkbox.
Lucky I have seen this horrible marketing ploy before, where it says local co-op AND multiplayer for the same game, but really all it has is local co-op.
And only local co-op = zero sale for me.
If it had co-op that would be at least 3 sales from me and my friends. At LEAST.
So well done for making stupid costumes instead of making the game better
I mean what's the point of customising your character if you can't show it off online? Doesn't that kind of beat the point?
I like the game but i agree on this. Would seriously like to have multiplayer added (And NOT in a sequel , it's pathetic if a dev do that.)
With the advent of high speed internet years ago I find it so mid boggling that devs are still not coding their games for online play, when the game is specifically designed for co-op.
I understand if a game is SP only, don't shoe-horn multiplayer or co-op in just to please people. But this game is built from the ground up to be a co-op game, so why no online play is totally beyond me, especially when they say the reason they couldn't do it is because they spent the time making cosmetic nonsense that you couldn't show off to other people even if you wanted to since you can't take it online.
It boggle's the mind, it really does
Congrats Drinkbox, you got my money with your "multiplayer" lie, but I'm going to make sure nobody I know buys this.
Other companies have done this and managed to trick me out of my money, and it's a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ thing to do.
What I don't understand though is how valve/steam allow such blatant false advertising on their store. If a game says multiplayer, then it should have MULTI-player. Not DUAL-player, same system.
When it says local co-op, there should be no need for anything else, because they must know that it would just confuse things, and fool people into buying a game that doesn't have what they expected
I sort of believe what he said, but I'm still going to actively tell as many people as I can to NOT buy this game until they add multiplayer because it's just silly how in 2013 devs are skipping on stuff like multiplayer when we have Steam right here.
Because multiplayer is a general term that mean "more than 1 player". No way it say online.
Also read the freaking description, it say LOCAL.
Drinkbox made it clear in the description, then about the tag at left learn them, there's some represent when it's online, but in guacamelee there's none that represent online. AND those tags are up to VALVe, not drinkbox
Defend them all you like, it is misleading, and valve send a checklist to any company who want to sell on steam, and it has tabs, such as "co-op", "multiplayer", "RPG" and so on. They check the tabs they want, ignore the ones they don't, so the developer asked for multiplayer to be put on the store page, NOT valve.
How could valve put it on when they don't know jack about the game? They didn't make the game, it would be illegal of them to tag it as something without the developers say so
The tag are up to VALVe, the devs have no control on it.
local co-op and multiplayer don't automaticly say it's ONLINE...
READ THE DESCRIPTION, it's clealy say local.... Rely on the game description the dev provive, not what VALVe tag provide.
And it is NOT up to valve what tags go on the store page. Valve didn't make the game. If they were to tag a game that belonged to someone else they would be liable. That would have left valve open to a lawsuit over the warz, and it would leave having to refund people for this game after they bought it expecting multiplayer when there is none.
The developer gets a list of tags when they release on steam, and they choose which they want shown. Valve are not allowed to choose these tags for them