安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Correct, that's why I think the ammo used in Sevastopol is very low powered. For reasons stated above. As for the shotgun's energy; the alien DOES get wounded by a shotgun blast. It bleeds (as the OP mentioned). But it's not strong enough to blow its limbs off and result in decapitation.
As for the different types of Aliens. I believe the xenomorph in Alien (1979) was a 'drone'. That being said, I don't think they're much different in terms of biological structure. The drone xenomorphs seem to be more stealth orientated, tasked with creating a hive and surviving. Whilst the ones in Aliens (1986) seem to be very aggressive and attack in large numbers. I believe they're called 'warriors'.
As for the harpoon shot at the alien, it was obviously high powered enough (also the range was quite close) to pierce the exoskeleton of the Alien. Like I said before, the shotgun in the game does wound the Alien, but it doesn't blow it to pieces due to the low powered ammunition.
http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/File:Alien_15.jpg
http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/File:Alien_17.jpg
Edit: Having just watched the final scene the harpoon sounds like it is air powered too.
Interesting find. But what you have to factor into the harpoon shot, is that the door was open to space. The vaccum was pulling everything out extremely fast. This could have aided in the penetration of the Alien's skin.
Whilst I don't deny the shotgun doing damage to the Alien, I believe it does, I do not think it's powerful enough, along with low power ammo, to dismember the Alien in Alien:Isolation causing death of the creature.
You've made some good points, though. :)
Hell, animals like bears you have to use high powered rifles on, because their skulls are so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ thick. So if animals with nothing except their flesh and bones can withstand shotgun pellets, then why are we expecting different results from an animal that has evolved a thick chitinous armour, that has been proven to withstand both heat and small arms fire?
Little lead balls might be semi-dangerous to softies such as us humans. But you cannot expect a creature created for the sole purpose of being the most dangerous prey in the universe, to be as toilet-paper flimsy as we are.
In real life a sand bag can stop an assault rifle round.
several feet of water can stop an assault rifle round.
Alien 1979 is unknown biology anything could happen. It can certanly take a hit at close range from a rocket engine.
Most animals that evolve on their own, which are predators, have thick enough skulls to easily deflect eveything from shotgun pellets, 9mm rounds, and even .22s from a rifle. If something like a bear can deflect pellets because of its skull, then I see no legitimate argument as to how one of the most dangerous creatures in the universe cannot deflect pellets with its chitin armour, as well as its unknown bone structure (for instance, the little mouth seems to be made up of a metallic material).
other shells can shoot bigger ♥♥♥♥ not just slugs
So it's just as cheaty as the teleporting
If you could, everytime you wounded the alien you would die before you got to a pressure door either from
acid splash
Hole melting straight through all the decks sucking you out into space and instant freez.
Occam's Razor suggests that the shotguns in Alien: Isolation utilize pellet-loaded shells. The game takes place on a vessel in space, where explosive decompression is a stark reality. No one in their right mind would bring anything more powerful than a shotgun using pellet-loaded shells, onto a structure where the slighest breach could cause everyone to die from exposure to space and lack of oxygen.