Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I added a link to my original post, check out the semiotics.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/214490/discussions/0/496880503059026522/
What?
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vt-IHALprVo/T1KKvWJhQOI/AAAAAAAABHw/XorZaodnnb8/s1600/alienripley2.jpg
What the..
My thoughts exactly. "Hey guys, d'ya know those classic sci-fi greats you love? Let's talk about how bad they were, shall we?"
Um, no. I think not.
https://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=define%20fornicate
huh ?
A guy who reviews dozens of games, seems to do nothing but play said games, and is well aware of how to polarise opinions and increase his post count, suddenly can't explain himself without external links to Google?
Again, I say - Um, no. Try harder.
What does a bunch of turds derailing my thread have anything to do with post count?
Nice try doging the, "so are you an ESL student, a retar* or both?"
I know that you are most likely not old enough to be able to appreciate this but Philip K. ♥♥♥♥ was horrified at how bad Blade Runner was ( compared to the source material ). I'll leave it up to you to fill in the blanks because I guess tanking in the box office wasn't obvious enough of a clue but whatever...
Ok, so that's your opinion, and that's absolutely fine of course, but semiotics was what you based your link on. That link was also more interested in fonts and faults than filmography, though there was a small section comparing Alien to older, more futuristic looking films.
The 70's designs was a choice, based on many factors, and for many, it works. Not for you apparently, I'm sure the director will be upset but you can't please everybody.
How does semiotics figure into any of that? That's a genuine question by the way.
I think you may be blurring the truth there also. Let me quote from wiki (not always accurate I'll grant, but these quotes have citations) -
After ♥♥♥♥ criticized an early version of Hampton Fancher's script in an article written for the Los Angeles Select TV Guide, the studio sent ♥♥♥♥ the David Peoples' rewrite. Although ♥♥♥♥ died shortly before the film's release, he was pleased with the rewritten script, and with a 20-minute special effects test reel that was screened for him when he was invited to the studio. Despite his well known skepticism of Hollywood in principle, ♥♥♥♥ enthused to Ridley Scott that the world created for the film looked exactly as he had imagined it. He said, "I saw a segment of Douglas Trumbull's special effects for Blade Runner on the KNBC-TV news. I recognized it immediately. It was my own interior world. They caught it perfectly." He also approved of the film's script, saying, "After I finished reading the screenplay, I got the novel out and looked through it. The two reinforce each other, so that someone who started with the novel would enjoy the movie and someone who started with the movie would enjoy the novel."
So, he died without ever having seen the finished film apparently, but according to you he was "horrified" when he compared it to the source material?