Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
I already told you but apparently you can't interpret things:
Administrator
Mode: Primarily User Mode, can request elevated privileges (UAC) for kernel-level operations. (in short: it can request kernel level access from System)
Administrator CAN request kernel level access from System, essentially while Administrator can't directly do the stuff that System or TrustedInstaller do, it can request to act on their behalf, not to mention as Administrator you can change ownership of files overtaking the problem when and if it arises.
Give Admin access to a person and they will easily do whatever they want with your PC: disable antivirus, disable security protections in place, installing viruses and what not, so really becoming System or TrustedInstaller isn't really the issue here.
When you install a driver that's exactly what's happening: Administrator will request kernel level access from System.
Of course you need to give access to EAC only during installation, because doing so it will install the system wide kernel level driver, still you NEED to be Administrator to allow that to happen in the first place, but you falsely claimed it wasn't needed at all.
Once again you don't need necessarily to be TrustedInstaller to have pretty much full control over a system, Administrator is more than enough, you don't need direct access to every single file, especially considering you can already completely alter the OS behaviour (eg. editing registry keys) and as I said alredy there are ways to become or act as TrustedInstaller.
This is not the place to get into details, but you can look for "No more Access Denied - I am TrustedInstaller".
Last but not least I NEVER ever insulted you, even though you'd deserve it for the way you treat people, and you never said what you think is wrong with my PC, because there's nothing wrong with it, always worked flawlessly, never a crash and I run multiple OS's both as multi boot and in a virtualized environment.
I never installed any cheating software on my PC mainly for 2 reasons:
- I don't think there's any fun in cheating
- I trust even less the developers of cheating software
As a rule of thumb the people insulting the others is always the one in the wrong.
Act on their behalf in the practical way at the end of the day doesn't change much since you can do whatever you want once you have admin access, since you can easily escalate privileges further (if ever needed), so really I don't think it's of any use splitting hair because the final result will still be full control over your computer, so I really don't understand all the useless fuss. Moral of the story doesn't change: having Administrator access leads to full control over a PC, period.
Yes you stated you don't need Administrator access for EAC, or at best you expressed yourself not clearly at all when you wrote:
"keep an eye on "Easy Anti Cheat" which is the most commonly used and most games that use EAC do not require admin rights as EAC runs in Kernel Mode"
Yes the game itself won't need admin access, but you will still need admin access to install EAC along with the game.
The very simple reason why there are 48GB of RAM in my PC is the stupidiest any person with a brain could imagine: my computer started with 2 8GB RAM modules, then I upgraded it some years later adding other 2 perfectly identical modules (same make, same exact model) but 16GB each since I needed more RAM for my virtual machines, and since I had no interest in reaching 64GB nor wanting to throw away 2 perfectly functioning modules I kept them all and they run in dual channel 8 with 8 and 16 with 16.
The same way I switched my secondary 4TB HDD to a 8TB HDD since the 4TB wasn't clearly advertised as a SMR drive and started to fail just after 2 years (I think there's been also a class action against Seagate for that), I still have the 4TB one installed but I don't trust it with anything and took the chance to get a bigger storage for games and internal backup, and I have a BD writer to further external backup.
Mind you when I assembled my PC RAM prices were high and regarding GPUs it was during the cryptomining crisis, I actually had to constantly monitor prices to get my GPU at a not crazy high price...
You'd better relax instead of starting insulting people you don't even know and accusing without a clue, also writing useless walls of text that prove absolutely nothing since my initial clue stands valid: administrator access will give full access.
P.S. I have Japanese friends and even lived in Japan for a while, I can tell you're definitely not Japanese, so you'd better stop posing as one, that attitude is surely all the opposite a Japanese person would ever have or want.
Too bad someone felt like this was the place to continuosly insult people to bring up useless stuff that didn't add anything to the conversation, because the one above is exactly the point.
I don't feel insulted because empty insults don't touch me, the fact that you kept insulting and attacking remains, and then when I simply said don't pose as a Japanese since you surely arent since you don't act at all like a honorable Japanese person you call me racist?
Simply for pointing out you're not what you pretend to be? I'm absolutely not racist, I don't know where you're from, all I know is that you're surely NOT Japanese.
Before going back to the original reason of this post I just feel compelled to show you how you behave and how you insult and attack people all the time, apparently without even realizing, or realizing and not caring and then denying:
I think it's time to block you so that this conversation can go along with better minded people that will focus on the actual point: what are admin rights for in this game?
What I've found out without investigating too much is that the game downloads stuff from who.nie.easebar.com when started, that's when it performs the downloaded file check, meaning it's downloading external components, not from Steam but from external servers.
First of all, getting personal with people disqualifies you from any intellectual conversation.
Also, the statement that many games ask for admin privileges is incorrect. Most do not, except perhaps during the initial installation of the game. As has been stated before, granting admin privileges means the application itself can do a lot of unwanted things.
It is clear to most of us that you have a very limited understanding of how security actually works, especially when you try to undermine a sysadmin who does this for a living.
There is always a keyboard warrior who has some Google skills but no actual experience in the field...
Upon checking the domain I was able to find this on the who is:
https://who.is/whois/easebar.com
https://otx.alienvault.com/indicator/domain/easebar.com
Did find a reddit post about it though:
https://www.reddit.com/r/DiabloImmortal/comments/yf9qlt/comment/iu3dwct
Seems to be NetEase related.
No game should need Admin rights.
In an online game like this is even worse due to remote code execution risks.
If the devs have no answer to my question then they should fix their game or warn people they are installing a potential backdoor in their computers.
Yes it's owned by NetEase, they host their own files, thing is granting admin privileges and then running unknown download files poses always some degree of risk.
What's downloaded through Steam is surely checked very, very well by Steam, I have no idea what happens when it's downloaded via external sources but I have my doubts that Steam can control that too.
I don't like giving admin rights to EAC and similar either but at least those work via trusted certificates and it's a trusted authority, which absolutely doesn't mean it's 100% safe, but still safer than giving rights to anything any developer decides you should run as admin.
I haven't done a thorough check on what else is done since I really don't have the time to do so, maybe someone else did, I'll be here listening for any possibile information.
Yeah, I feel that if someone has to fall back on "well this Gacha game does the concerning thing too" as their argument then it's off to a bad start. I'm not really interested in Whataboutisms, especially when the examples being pointed to are just as questionable.
I have seen it on u tube but it's not on the store page.
Demo was only available to be played during June 10-17. Have to wait for full release to play.
Here following steps to remove run as administrator permission from an apps:
1-Right click on that program shortcut which in on desktop.
2- click on "Show more options".
3- Choose properties option and go to compatibility tab
4-Uncheck the box "Run this program as an administrator". If it's Checked ?
5-Click Apply and then OK
6- Same steps for other apps also.
You do know applications & games can forcibly request admin elevation no matter how you change that setting, right? And that they can refuse to run if not elevated?
This is valid only for shortcuts set to run as admin, in this game the executable file itself requires admin access (and yes the checkmark isn't set in case you were asking).
This means it's set to run as Administrator either from some registry key or from some manifest.
I agree with you there.