Back then Ubisoft is truly creating games for gamers.

Before Ubisoft made the franchise open world, Ghost Recon games were carefully crafted single player experiences like COD, but executed in a more "authentic" fashion.

Future soldier was the last, and best example of where they could go. Sure, the story is sub par, but it is serviceable to help guide you from mission to mission, which all do have varied environments and mission types.

Major problem: Online services keep blocking me from playing the campaign. After repeated attempts I can, but this is an unfortunate oversight.

Not only an abysmal PC port, but an average game entirely. Somehow its successor, Wildlands is better and Wildlands is the epitome of lameness. If you were expecting anything tactical from the series of tactical games with the "tactical brand" of Tom Clancy, guess again buck-o because this game is even less "tactical" than Wildlands, Blacklist, Conviction, or the Vegas games COMBINED. Do you like open ended missions where you can handle something however you want and play on your own time? Well TOO BAD dipsh*t, patience is for LOSERS.

If it isn't the constant forced "this or that" this game pushes into your face constantly that breaks the experience, it's the awful graphics for a 2012 game with humans that you'd think were from a 2005 early Xbox 360 game or maybe the 2010 feeling to everything else like the sprinting, the aiming, the ai, everything trying to edgy or everything trying to be "weighty" (And failing at it). Not only do the graphics hold the game back, but the story is probably the worst I've seen in an Ubisoft game (Until Far Cry 5) with how obnoxiously LAME and edgy it is.

TLDR: Truly a product of the 360's LAME era.