Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I found that small chest (2x3:16), Large chest(3x3: 24), and Avian Tombs (6x2: 32, stackable) have equal best efficiency (2.667 storage per block dimention).
now that the small square 2x2 containers have all been nerfed down to 9 storage, they are a less efficient option (2.25 storage/block)
Larger containers such as Cool Cupboards (4x5: 32) 1.6 storage/block, and Lunarbase locker (5x5: 48) 1.92 storage/block are even worse, in terms of storage efficiency.
Hope that helps clarify the situation.
On the ship I can stack 5 metal crates on top of each other for a maximum of 80 items. That is 3x10 for a block efficiency of 2.67. But I can only put 3 small chests on top of each other on my ship because of the shelf constraints and ship dimensions. That makes the small chest dimension 2x10 (including the wasted space) for a reduction in efficiency of 2.4.
Sometimes I think I am thinking about this game too much.
I've got a ton of the lunar base lockers (the ones that hold 64) because I'm a total hoarder.