Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
what are the stutters like. is ya fps going up and down alot ? like some area/looking direction high other low?
If it's the framerate going up and down, then sadly it's normal... this is not a very good pc port and it shows in many ways, mainly performance... no matter how beefy your pc is, reaching a stable 60 fps is really hard... the game itself was just not meant to do that.
Remaster is a better port and it surely performs better than this, but some people don't like it for the changes in gameplay, some don't like it because they didn't get it for free, some are just bandwagon haters... there are some valid reasons to prefer PTDE over the remaster though.
I bought Remastered and it is a lot more stable. There are still framedrops, but much less noticable compared to PTDE.
I kinda understand that people are angry that they did not get it for free. However, I paid $5 for PTDE and topping $20 extra is not that bad.
can you elaborate here? I understand that there is bigger mod community for PTDE, graphics are bit bitter, but other than that, what are reasons to prefer it? It was OK when remastered was not here. However, it is released and if somebody wants to play it (and have extra $20), one should definitely pay extra.
If one doesn't care about mods or multiplayer that much though, there's no reason to not jump into the remaster instead of PTDE.
Fromsoft is not EA, or Ubisoft or any of these other AAA developers who piece out their games with preorder exclusives, in-game currency and other nonsense. Their games are sold as complete packages and offered with proper DLC expansions which offer more of the same quality content. They are FAR from the cash-grabbing evil empire some people want to paint them as.
EA asserts authoritive enough control over its various properties that they are far from being "just the publisher." Ubisoft most certainly still develops its own games so I'm not sure what purpose this comment has.
Yes, FromSoft is to blame for its technical shortcomings when they decided to port the original DS. But they did not decide to make and market the Remaster as it was done, nor did they decide that they weren't coming back on patching the original. That was all Bamco's decision.
If you are new to Dark Souls and don't plan to invest much time into the game then you should probably get Remastered version. If you already own an original version then it's a "MuH cAsH gRaB!!" (read paid patch).
One may argue that "people shouldn't work for free", but I am not a fan of the paid patches idea.
In other words if you own PtDE then DSFix is better than Remaster because anything is better than paid patches. If you are new to Dark Souls then DSFix is not better than DaS:R.