What Geralt would've done? * Spoilers *

[DecayWolf]

I'm gonna try avoid spoilers for others.

Act 3, We've that decision to kill or spare him. I believe Geralt would let him scape, since he doesn't show to be a mad beast without concience, also Geralt had a friend ancient vampire and a dragon,
So it's very obvious that he would spare him.

Act 4. With Berengar , I have no doubt he doesn't wanna fightt him, mainly because of his code. But he would be kind with and compreensive or would be rude for his actions? And then trigger a unwanted fight?

I'm new on this serie, so I don't know exatly which would be Geralt personality and behavior, can some one clarify my doubt about his possible decision?
Since it's a RPG and my character is Geralt of Rivia, I'm trying to play exactly as he would, otherwise he would just be a fake UI doing stupid stuff, to not mention what's the fun to play a RPG if there's no immersion? I could been playing another game which I could make my own hero, thus make my own decisions based entirly on my personal taste or the lore background history that I put on my character.

Anyways, in resume I do care for this silly thigs, and I want to play "right."

[Ragnarök]

Act 3: Spare and help him break the curse. He was never a monster.

Act 4: I doubt Geralt would go as far as killing him. He had legitimate reasons for hating Witchers, some of which Geralt shared, however he sold himself to the devil and lost all sympathy for essentially selling children into slavery. I could see Geralt being disgusted with him and forcing him to live with that guilt for as long as it would take a less sympathetic Witcher to come along and put him down as a renegade. There would most certainly be words though and that could lead to a fight.

[DecayWolf]

Originally posted by Ragnarök:

Act 4: I doubt Geralt would go as far as killing him. He had legitimate reasons for hating Witchers, some of which Geralt shared, however he sold himself to the devil and lost all sympathy for essentially selling children into slavery. I could see Geralt being disgusted with him and forcing him to live with that guilt for as long as it would take a less sympathetic Witcher to come along and put him down as a renegade. There would most certainly be words though and that could lead to a fight.

That was exactly what comes into my mind.
I know he doesn't want to fight him, nor kill him, but "I could see Geralt being disgusted with him and forcing him to live with that guilt for as long as it would take a less sympathetic Witcher to come along and put him down as a renegade.", I believe that would be what really happened.

Originally posted by bgheff:

Act 3: it's implied that staying a werewolf and continuing his actions will eventually make him lose the control he has. I'd say either kill him or spare him and get him to give up being a werewolf.

Act 4: Really, I think either result would work

About act 3, I know Vicent can eventually lose control to the beast, and become a full monster someday, but I really don't think Geralt would've killed him. ( I was wanting, because of his Fur, but I didn't to respect the lore.)

Originally posted by bgheff:

Act 4: Really, I think either result would work

It seems to be a very easy question to answer, but it's a little tricky.
Geralt would never ever fight another witcher, because of his code, besides he isn't someone who always kill the monster. But on Act 1, Salamandar killed Leo and stolem Mutagenic and also put another witchers on risk, almost killed Triss, he show be pretty pissed off with the priest at the cave, when he saw he did gave those childrens to salamander, and he told to Thaler he wants to destroy salamandar so badly.

So for one side, he doesn't want to fight him, but for other side he isn't someone who hear things and keep his mouth shut.
A good example is the ending of Act 3, with Adda.

So, perhaps he could've said something rude and lead to a unwanted fight, which he would only do, because he had absolutely no choice at all.

That's my conclusion at least. :P

The problem comes now, because doesn't suppoed to kill another witcher, that's one of worest thing he could ever done. I can see Geralt fighting Berengar, defeating him and even saying he doesn't worth anything after winning the fight, but never killing him.

[DecayWolf]

Well since Geralt would never kill another Witcher, even if he did betrayel his own clan. (not actually), so I've spare him.