Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
Batman running over people with the Batmobile doesn't necessarily kill them (after all, we are working with comic book logic here). You shouldn't be making this assumption.
Also, from what I've seen, people run and jump out of your way.
Can you please provide a specific example of Batman (Bruce Wayne) in the mainstream comic universe intentionally killing someone (with the exception of Darkseid)?
Batmobile runs over thug at 300 km/h, left with unconscious 40bpm thug. Totally not dead or severely injured...
Typical Arkham nonsense. :P
Like I said earlier, comic book logic. Another great example, in the Knightfall comic, Batman stays awake and works nonstop for weeks, then gets the ♥♥♥♥ beaten out of him, then gets the ♥♥♥♥ beaten out of him again, gets his spine broken, dragged throught the streets of Gotham and then thrown off a building. He made a full recovery a few months later. Oh, and all that was before his suit had any real armor on it.
Now, yes, that's Batman, but he is human. If Batman can survive (not to mention fully recover from) that, then surely a thug can survive getting hit by a car.
sorry your not giving any reason why rnning over somone does not kill them
I should make that assmumption
Comic book logic, the fact that detective vision will show them as being alive, getting hit by a car in real life isn't necessarily an instant kill, and from what I've seen they jump out of your way so you can't even hit them.
Also, I gave my reasoning a few pages ago. I will quote it directly just for you.
Sure, I don't know exactly what it is, but still.
Christopher Nolan who is the creator of the new batman said batman never kills anyone, batman has rules now Nolan said, "he is no longer a vigilante but a guardian of truth and freedom". Another rule is batman is not allowed to use any offensive language or say anything obscene.
Nolan's batman is the only batman that matters since it made the most money. As Nolan has said the other batman movies, cartoons, and old tv shows are trash that destroyed the batman franchise which he proved by how much fans loved his batman giving him more money than any other batman serial because their crap. Before Nolan everyone hated Batman, but Nolan made Batman a star.
Can't really say that. Most comic book readers enjoyed Batman through The Golden Age to New 52. Some of my favorites are Jeph Loeb, and Frank Miller; they did an amazing job.
Are you just making this up?
Those guys are all frauds who did NOT work with Nolan which is why they make no money since they use the version of batman everyone hates. Their refusal to consult with Nolan is why their subscription base is so small because they wont put the time in to learn about the one true batman from the Nolan trilogy.
What the hell? There's nothing fraudulent about writing comics. Get the hell out of here you troll.
Edit: Also, if Batman was so hated, how come his comics have been around (and popular) for 75+ years?
My ass. If they went bankrupt so much, why did the keep making the comics? Hint: Because people liked Batman. Again, Frank Miller. Jeph Loeb. Geoff Johns. Bruce Timm. Tim Burton. All of them made amazing comics.
What do you mean 'real' Batman fans. I am definitely a real Batman fan, and I love all of the comics I have read. They have to consult Nolan? Well ♥♥♥♥, Nolan was 17 when Year One came out, so I guess they're screwed. Also, you just admitted to not even reading the comics, so how can you judge them fairly?
Get out of here. You're a joke.
Edit: I accidentally implied that Tim Burton made comics. My bad. He was only responsible for
'Batman' (1989) and 'Batman Returns' (1992-ish) movies