Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Pls elaborate though Id love to hear what you mean at how they compare I love all three movies and all three arkham games plus origin that was good but flawed. :)
The only camparison I can see between the two is Scarecrow's plan to use fear gas on the city.
EDIT
Oh i just remembered that its the Nolanverse and the Arkhamverse.
Yeah, it's just two different approaches to the same story. I like them both in their own way, but the Nolan version of Gordon makes slightly more sense to me because you'd think a noble cop surrounded by crooks would turn in desperation to anyone who's willing to help without blinking.