Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Barbara and chair - also story from comics, play further to see what happened.
Dark Knight - you'll know near game ending. If you read comics you could have already guessed.
Islands - yes, this area is new. Gotham consists of several islands, Origins has one island from the City game. If you look around you can see those islands afar.
This game continues events of Origins, Asylum and City. In that order. Not some fic.
Abilities - I guess devs wouldn't want overpowered character from the start. You could also ask why Batman forgot some moves from Origins in Asylum.
On a more serious note, they answer most of this later.
... And This Time PAY ATTENTION.
Barbara was in the wheelchair all the way back in Arkham Asylum. The image in her character bio clearly showed that. She wasn't in the chair in Origins because that was a prequel; she wasn't in the chair yet, then. If you play Knight long enough, you'll get a flashback to the event that put her in the wheelchair (which is based on the comics).
This is a completely different area of the City. You can see the areas from older games off in the distance.
Regarding the "Dark Knight," are you really asking for major spoilers about the story? Wouldn't you rather just play the game and find out for yourself?
These games take place in their own continuity, often referred to as the Arkhamverse. That continuity doesn't include the main comics or any of the Batman movies (unless you count Assault on Arkham, and that's questionable).
There are four major games in the series. In release order, they are Asylum, City, Origins, and Knight. Asylum-City-Knight form a trilogy. Origins is another game in the same continuity, but its storyline is not tightly tied to the other three. Calling the four games a quadrilogy would be like calling The Lord of the Rings books a quadrilogy because of the existence of The Hobbit. (Although LotR was techically six "books," but you know what I mean.)
Regarding upgrades: well, that shouldn't be a serious question. You can ask the same sort of thing about any video game where they made a tradeoff favoring gameplay over story. The answer is that it's a video game. If it really bugs you, just tell yourself he got rusty when crime dropped after the events of City. And don't think too much about why hitting enough people produces little magic points that he can use to instantly improve his skills and technology.
Yeah, if you read the comics before playing the games but if you're like me and went straight for the games knowing little about Batman and his world aside from the batman movies which I watched years ago, you would be pretty lost, wouldn't you?
You're right.....hmmmmmmm.........
ok fair enough, I guess I was over reacting a bit....
Nigma? Enigma?
Thanks.
Oh woops, I guess wrong spelling...heh... Anyways I thought Mr Freeze did it...? I remember going around in killer croc's territory collecting some spore samples for it. I don't remember Lucius being mentioned though....
Yeah but how does Lucius know the true identity of the Batman? Did he do what Bane did and deduce it from some gadget tech he used on went snooping like Hugo Strange and found him out that way? Or did Bruce just outright told him because he trusts him to keep it a secret? Also while we're on the subject, how and why did Bruce step down as CEO and let him take the mantle? Or is all of this explained in the game later as I progress in Akham Knight?
I guess not, guess I'll find out spoiler free when i finish the game...
Why didn't the games just adapt the comics? So you basically get a game version of parts of the comics so it at least still stays faithful to source material instead of making up a new storyline creating a parallel/alternate universe of it? And why isn't the movie Assault on Arkham considered questionable? According to wikipedia, it is set two years before Asylum so would feel in some blanks that the games don't explain or tell?
Why isn't it tightly tied to the other three? Both Origins still has Batman as the protaganist whilst the lord of the rings have frodo and sam, and the other two hobbits whose name escapes me memory (pippin was one of them I think, forgot who the fourth one was) and the hobbit followed Frodo's uncle, whose name also escapes me... The movies had a trilogy of each of them - i haven't read the books of the movies it's based on so all my info is from the movies but according to various sources they have almost faithfully adapted the books...with the most notable change was how they dialogs were done between each character and the ending of return of the king. That's all I remember, there were other changes too but forgot about them.
But yeah, I can understand The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings as two seperate trilogy, but not Akham Origins and Akham Asylum, Akham City and Akham Knight as two seperate beings.
Well I see there are new abilities and feats in Knight that werent available in any of the prior three, so why didn't they just done that and just gave pre-specced out Batman with his old abilities and moves from the previous games?
Hahahaha... I'd like them to have done a more indepth skill system, probably akin to a proper RPG system would be cool....
To me, Enigma just wants to spite Batman's self esteem after finding out Batman could unravel all his riddles and mysteries with relative ease, thereby de-enigmaring him which I bet he found annoying, assuming the reason he picked that nickname was because no one could solve him until Batman came...
Also why do I need to collect his trophies before finishing the main storyline? The only time I did that was on Asylum and for City and Origins, I just left it at the end after rushing through the story and then cleaned up the map of all collectables and side missions using a guide on some of the ones I couldn't find or solve myself at least without spending over a few minutes on each not including travel time....
And yes, well I mean I did collect the other 430 or so ones in City that I hadn't collected whilst doing the main or side missions...which took a good while to do....
Also the reason why I leave it to last now is because some collectables are locked and can only be collected after you unlock a gadget or an area after doing a mission....so why not do it all in one hit at the end when they all become available?
If you wanted to know more about him, there should be a character bio unlocked in Arkham Knight.
As far as I know, none of that has been detailed in the Arkhamverse. It's likely that Lucius deduced that his boss was Batman when he kept using WayneTech to make Batman stuff. You say you've watched "the Batman movies." If you mean the Nolanverse films, then you'll remember that's basically how he found out there.
You must be new to comic book characters. You could ask the same thing about the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Or nearly any other adaptation of a comic book story.
In general, even when a writer is basing a work on an existing story, it's easier for them to set it in a universe where they don't have to worry about 80 years of continuity baggage. Even the DC comics themselves have rebooted the storyline several times.
Also, if the audience already knows the source material, they might rather see a fresh new story than a rehash of something they're already familiar with.
I say it's questionable because it has some plot holes that make it not quite make sense in the continuity of the games. Its writers intended for it to be in the Arkhamverse, but they didn't necessarily research the continuity very well or collaborate with the people responsible for the games' storylines.
Because, although it's set in the same universe, it's a different story. The other three are parts one, two, and three of a single story about Joker using Titan and the consequences of that. Origins (which was made by a different developer) is not about that story; it's about the origins of Batman's relationships with several major characters.
It's also pretty clear from the very start that you're not supposed to know who Arkham Knight is. You know, that's the mystery. And in that regard, you might actually be at an advantage by knowing little Batman lore, because that subplot actually turns out to be more or less an adaptation of one of the most famous Batman stories, and it's really kind of obvious from the start if you're familiar with it.
My advice would be to hold your questions til the end.
And this is so kosher that they kind of don't bother explaining how it works sometimes. Like, in BTAS, for example, in one episode, Batman gets injured and stumbles into Leslie's clinic or whatever and she's all like "oh Bruce, you're injured!" and they never really give an explanation other than, well, she's his doctor so...
The secret is more in the general sense that, like, maybe a dozen or so people know, but the other several billion in the world don't, lol.