Batman™: Arkham Knight

Batman™: Arkham Knight

Ver estadísticas:
Q alt 24 JUL 2016 a las 15:03
Is the game finally well optimized?
(title)
I gave it a year to get better.
< >
Mostrando 1-15 de 22 comentarios
FreeToaster 24 JUL 2016 a las 15:05 
It's certainly in a much better state than when it originally launched, but opinions seem to vary of course, it really all depends on your system.
Jacopo Beanman 24 JUL 2016 a las 15:09 
i went from constant drops to 30fps to consistent 60fps in most areas. the lowest i'll ever drop is to 50. there is still the issue of texture streaming (the cause of most fps issues), but other than that, its very playable.

thats a big jump from what the game was before.
Última edición por Jacopo Beanman; 24 JUL 2016 a las 15:10
AttackoftheGout 24 JUL 2016 a las 20:03 
Still crappy on gt750m 2gb ddr5 a.k.a gtx 650 2gb ddr5 a.k.a gt 740 2gb ddr5.
Drop to 15fps when gladin' & drivin'.
Última edición por AttackoftheGout; 24 JUL 2016 a las 20:08
bullitt_boy 24 JUL 2016 a las 20:34 
I would say YES. It's waaay more optimized than the initial launch. I had major stuttering when it first launched and after about the 3rd or 4th patch it was much smoother and running at a near constant 60fps (except for the Batmobile). I just wish they'd waited a year before releasing it to optimize more like Rockstar did with their PC port of GTA V. I think Warner Bros were just trying to ride the wave of advertising with the console releases.

Although my processor is still just an overclocked i5 3570K I've since upgraded my video card (GTX 980 to GTX 1080), hard drive (2TB Western Digital Black to 1TB Samsung 850 EVO), and RAM (8GB to 16GB). I also just bought a G-sync monitor and with all that it's silky smooth. It runs anywhere between 70-90fps on ULTRA settings at 3440x1440.
Última edición por bullitt_boy; 24 JUL 2016 a las 20:38
Roast Goose 24 JUL 2016 a las 21:01 
Publicado originalmente por I_Hate_U_2:
Still crappy on gt750m 2gb ddr5 a.k.a gtx 650 2gb ddr5 a.k.a gt 740 2gb ddr5.
Drop to 15fps when gladin' & drivin'.
They're very low end cards for today. What did you expect?
trek554 24 JUL 2016 a las 23:02 
Publicado originalmente por I_Hate_U_2:
Still crappy on gt750m 2gb ddr5 a.k.a gtx 650 2gb ddr5 a.k.a gt 740 2gb ddr5.
Drop to 15fps when gladin' & drivin'.
um that gpu is complete ♥♥♥♥ and does not even come close to meeting minimum requirements for any modern game.
AttackoftheGout 24 JUL 2016 a las 23:18 
Publicado originalmente por Roast Goose:
Publicado originalmente por I_Hate_U_2:
Still crappy on gt750m 2gb ddr5 a.k.a gtx 650 2gb ddr5 a.k.a gt 740 2gb ddr5.
Drop to 15fps when gladin' & drivin'.
They're very low end cards for today. What did you expect?

Publicado originalmente por trek554:
Publicado originalmente por I_Hate_U_2:
Still crappy on gt750m 2gb ddr5 a.k.a gtx 650 2gb ddr5 a.k.a gt 740 2gb ddr5.
Drop to 15fps when gladin' & drivin'.
um that gpu is complete ♥♥♥♥ and does not even come close to meeting minimum requirements for any modern game.
Yup. Used ta be da bomb. Now.....
Oh well. Upgrading ta gtx 950m/960m.
trek554 24 JUL 2016 a las 23:23 
Publicado originalmente por I_Hate_U_2:
Publicado originalmente por Roast Goose:
They're very low end cards for today. What did you expect?

Publicado originalmente por trek554:
um that gpu is complete ♥♥♥♥ and does not even come close to meeting minimum requirements for any modern game.
Yup. Used ta be da bomb. Now.....
Oh well. Upgrading ta gtx 950m/960m.
lol a 750m was never "da bomb" and was low end when it came out. and a 950m or even 960m will still be below minimum requirements for modern games as they are nothing more but a desktop 750 ti.
AttackoftheGout 24 JUL 2016 a las 23:25 
Publicado originalmente por trek554:
Publicado originalmente por I_Hate_U_2:


Yup. Used ta be da bomb. Now.....
Oh well. Upgrading ta gtx 950m/960m.
lol a 750m was never "da bomb" and was low end when it came out. and a 950m or even 960m will still be below minimum requirements for modern games as they are nothing more but a desktop 750 ti.
That's wut I can afford.
trek554 24 JUL 2016 a las 23:28 
Publicado originalmente por I_Hate_U_2:
Publicado originalmente por trek554:
lol a 750m was never "da bomb" and was low end when it came out. and a 950m or even 960m will still be below minimum requirements for modern games as they are nothing more but a desktop 750 ti.
That's wut I can afford.
well then you will not be playing demanding games smoothly without greatly reducing the settings. maybe wait a few months for mobile Pascal gpus to come out.
ExaKel 25 JUL 2016 a las 1:40 
a 980m can play this at 1080p with everything maxed out and GW on at 30fps no problem.
TheJohnMan1980 25 JUL 2016 a las 5:04 
I would say yes. It's a lot better then it was at launch and when it came back via patch. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fq1mIeNll_Q
Hunky Dory 25 JUL 2016 a las 7:18 
I've got about 50 min of gameplay and had one hard crash. I also need to alt tab every time I launch the game if I want 60 fps. Otherwise it's unplayable 20-30. I have R9 390.
mckrackin5324 25 JUL 2016 a las 12:20 
I also waited a year.
I've now got 20 hours in the past few days and it's meh...
I run a pretty steady 55-60 FPS until the Batmobile appears and it drops...sometimes to single digits.lol...But usually about 35-40 FPS...stupid car ruined the game in more ways than FPS though.
I have no interest in Mario Karts.

The game itself is Terribad after playing City,Asylum and Origins.
And yes...I have played all of them very very recently.

But yeah...it's very playable now.
Jokke 25 JUL 2016 a las 14:00 
Works great for me, I am on a i7-6700k, gtx 970 & 8 gb ram. Never dropped under 60fps.
< >
Mostrando 1-15 de 22 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Publicado el: 24 JUL 2016 a las 15:03
Mensajes: 22