Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Yeah i want too playable character evil too.
You forget one thing, if it's Batman reborn, no tactics he uses will really make criminals fear him unless he starts killing them, and Batman will never do that. He never kills anyone, and he never stoops to using tactics of criminals, so I highly doubt he'll use fear toxin either.
Only time he ever used fear toxin in Arkham Knight was on Scarecrow at the end, and that was to escape his grasp and give him a taste of his own medicine. It would ruin the franchise though if they turned Batman into a glorified Scarecrow. It needs to be more creative (heroic) than that.
The only thing that makes sense is Azrael being tricked by Saint Dumas into posing as Batman, and using fear toxin, and Batman covertly taking down the criminals, and eventually Azrael. Some of the public might think it's Batman's wraith, but they won't believe Batman is alive.
I assume he will only appear when it's REALLY REALLY necessary, and do something (probably by driving people insane with modified fear toxin) to make sure that noone believes it was real.
First off, I don't agree he's intending on being "Nightmare Batman", or that the end of the Knightfall Protocol was even showing him as the fiery bat.
Secondly, literally every game in the series has had a scenario of civilian evacuation, so it wouldn't be hard to stay covert.
Thirdly, your analogy of him using the fear toxin brings up another reason why he wouldn't likely do such a thing. It doesn't just make people fear, it often drives them permanently insane, and that goes against his code of hurting people.
If they were to write it such a way, it wouldn't even BE Batman anymore, and he would be just another criminal, with no code to follow.
He doesn't need to kill anyone.. feargas plus the old Batman combined does the trick.
Notice just how nuts a lot the bad guys become once they have inhaled it?
There's no immunity against it.
You can notice how the level of fear is vanishing as time passes by. In Origins there is often nothing at all, because they do not know Batman, but his legend builds up and vanes in Knight, people have gotten used to him and his presence.
I don't think that's what's going on. He's probably using a much less potent version of the fear toxin that would only have a temporary effect. He may have to be more intense and brutal than he was before, but he still has his code. Permanently disabling someone or driving them permanently insane is something he would generally tend to avoid.
They've all had civilians absent (with the exception of Asylum, which had doctors, security guards, etc), but Arkham Knight was the only one that had a full-on evacuation. Arkham City was a prison facility, and Origins was a city-wide curfew.
How are the doctors not civilains? I could understand the security guards not being counted, but doctors?
Well, not alive ones, anyway.
That could be argued, but there was still an evacuation. What I meant was that the other games didn't have an actual evacuation, only Arkham Knight did.
It doesn't really matter whether the devs write evac in the storyline, because 99% of the people present in every game in this series is thugs, not civilians. That's my main point.
All Batman really needs to do to stay covert is not report to the police, and avoid being seen by the very few public service workers and hostages in the game. Not exactly rocket science for someone so good at stealth.
Medical doctors, sure, but most of the doctors on the island would be psychiatrists or psychologists. I would consider those civilians.
You realize you sort of just invalidated your own point, right?
This is true, but it's beside the point I was trying to make.
I wouldn't really consider this a viable theory ("it didn't actually happen" or "it was all a dream" type theories tend to lack substance and creativity), but it's not necessarily wrong. That scene does represent Batman's continued existence, both literally and metaphorically. Bruce Wayne may be gone, but Batman is more than just a man, it's a symbol. To the innocent, it's a symbol of hope, and to the guilty, a symbol of fear. Even if he is truly gone, his legend lives on in the minds of the people of Gotham.
Scarecrow gassed a large part of the city, but none became mad for life (with the exception of many scarecrow himself). As soon as Poison Ivy's plants did their work things started slowly to get back to normal. You didn't enter the Riddler's house only to find catwoman being complely mad, she was her normal self. Heck, she doesn't even comment on the whole event.
And as it has been mentioned, since Batman has tools to analyze the toxins surely he has the power to modify it too.
None of the other "heroes" in Batman are up to the task either, they're nowhere near the competence of the Bat.
Actually I was speaking on YOUR calling them civvies. My stance is that they aren't. I merely stated they are less necessary than doctors for the purposes of helping civilians. The fact is, YOU were the one that contradicted yourself by implying they aren't civvies.
It's not besides MY point though, which you seem to be oblivious of when arguing civilians with me. You just made it clear you only think about your own points when having a discussion, which isn't really a discussion at that point.