Anyone else disappointed by Deathstroke boss fight

[ChequeMate]

You need to completed 3 Most Wanted missions to fight him and all you get a lousy rehashed version of Cloudburst battle. The Deathstroke boss fight in Origins is one of the best boss battle in the Arkham series and they wasted the opportunity to bring that to glory.

[knightsam311]

Originally posted by ChequeMate:

You need to completed 3 Most Wanted missions to fight him and all you get a lousy rehashed version of Cloudburst battle. The Deathstroke boss fight in Origins is one of the best boss battle in the Arkham series and they wasted the opportunity to bring that to glory.

Yes its disappointing i wish that the fight wasnt another re used tank fight... oh well.

[Viksteri]

yes very dissapointing compared to origins boss fight

[VERSAT1L]

Overall Arkham Knight doesn't hold a candle against the rest of the franchise.

[GrizzGolf]

I was mad. It could have been like origins. I wish WB would drop another Batman game

[ChequeMate]

They could have added a hand to hand combat scenario after the tank fight, the way he lunged at Batman after his tnak was destroyed I was expecting one.

[Arcangelo]

All Arkham Knight was a disappointment, it's the only game of the franchise I finished only once.
People bash Origins a lot, but Origins is ten times better than Knight (and it's even better than City at times).

[knightsam311]

Originally posted by Arcangelo:

All Arkham Knight was a disappointment, it's the only game of the franchise I finished only once.
People bash Origins a lot, but Origins is ten times better than Knight (and it's even better than City at times).

I disagree but thats your opinion and ill respect it.

[Arcangelo]

Originally posted by knightsam311:

Originally posted by Arcangelo:

All Arkham Knight was a disappointment, it's the only game of the franchise I finished only once.
People bash Origins a lot, but Origins is ten times better than Knight (and it's even better than City at times).

Not in my opinion but thats yours and ill respect it.

Absolutely. To me Knight is only good for the graphics and the open world. Most of the game is repetitive as hell, the Batmobile (which is 70% of the game) is nice at first, then becomes boring, boss battles are ridiculous or inexistent and the plot is kinda bad.
At least Origins has the best boss battles of the franchise.

[ChequeMate]

Originally posted by Arcangelo:

Absolutely. To me Knight is only good for the graphics and the open world. Most of the game is repetitive as hell, the Batmobile (which is 70% of the game) is nice at first, then becomes boring, boss battles are ridiculous or inexistent and the plot is kinda bad.
At least Origins has the best boss battles of the franchise.

Absolutely agree. Origins had the best boss fights in the series. The Batmobile sections are a nightmare for KB+M users.

[SenMithrarin85]

I can only imagine what could have been if RS and WB Montreal pooled their talents. each cover the other's weaknesses: wbm's game wasn't as polished (many unpatched bugs) and rs can't do story and bosses to save their lives.

paul dini's absence from knight could not have been more apparent

[GrizzGolf]

I really hope WB will visit another Batman game

[Pcnuttie]

Originally posted by GrizzGolf:

I really hope WB will visit another Batman game

I am pretty sure they will when Justice Leaque gets good reviews in box office and Batman solo films might be a good promotion for WB to do another one. I remember Rocksteady hinted on a Superman PC game.

[halbermensch999]

Originally posted by ChequeMate:

Originally posted by Arcangelo:

Absolutely. To me Knight is only good for the graphics and the open world. Most of the game is repetitive as hell, the Batmobile (which is 70% of the game) is nice at first, then becomes boring, boss battles are ridiculous or inexistent and the plot is kinda bad.
At least Origins has the best boss battles of the franchise.

Absolutely agree. Origins had the best boss fights in the series. The Batmobile sections are a nightmare for KB+M users.

I get that that there is a bit too much BM but I don't get how it is a nightmare.

Origins had some good boss fights, it starts very poorly with killer-croc who doesn't even feel threatening (sadly this was also true in Knight), but some bosses are too QTE type, if you make a simple mistake against Bane on the rooftop it is impossible for instance to escape.

[Mikasa Ackerman]

Originally posted by Arcangelo:

Originally posted by knightsam311:

Not in my opinion but thats yours and ill respect it.

Absolutely. To me Knight is only good for the graphics and the open world. Most of the game is repetitive as hell, the Batmobile (which is 70% of the game) is nice at first, then becomes boring, boss battles are ridiculous or inexistent and the plot is kinda bad.
At least Origins has the best boss battles of the franchise.

its sad how arkham asylum had more content basically , arkham knight only had ~50% of the Knight HQ , the Film Studio and the 2 Airships , and were ALL areas that were buildings for just batman , also the characters all are super weird imo , i didnt mind Ivys more human design ( in the other games she was too green for someone who just is a human / plant hybrid)
but harley quinn , and all the other villains they simply had weird designs , none of them looked evil

[Andone.]

火坏l