lag on rx560x

[Red™]

i cant get it resolved

[Seamus]

Well, your gpu just barely makes the recommended specs, so... turn some settings down?

[Red™]

Are you sure? Because I’m pretty sure my gpu is way above the recommended setting

[Seamus]

Not really, no. https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/compare/Radeon-RX-560X-vs-GeForce-GTX-760/4139vs2561

[Red™]

Strange. Most user benchmark can run it without too much issues. Do you know how to change graphic from Vega 8 to RX560x? I try going on the raedon control panel, go to switchable, and I found one of the card, said rx560x are runnin at balanced mode. I set it to full performance but that haven’t done anything

[Red™]

Arkham Knight VRAM said I’m using RX560x. I’m watching the youtube benchmark and it appear they are performing better than I do. I even download the latest driver update and t haven’t done nothing

[Seamus]

Not sure on how to tell amd's control panel which chip to use. I haven't dealt with an amd laptop since before ryzen.

[Ancient]

https://www.amd.com/en/support/kb/faq/dh-017

And yeah, the Radeon Pro 560X (there is no such thing as an RX 560X), even if working normally, is pretty weak. It falls slightly below the min spec GTX 660 and well below the recommended GTX 760: https://imgur.com/WWPBSOB

It's a mobile chip, after all. It's around 20-25% slower than the desktop RX 560: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-560-vs-AMD-Radeon-Pro-560X/3926vsm541446

[Red™]

Originally posted by Ancient:

https://www.amd.com/en/support/kb/faq/dh-017

And yeah, the Radeon Pro 560X (there is no such thing as an RX 560X), even if working normally, is pretty weak. It falls slightly below the min spec GTX 660 and well below the recommended GTX 760: https://imgur.com/WWPBSOB

It's a mobile chip, after all. It's around 20-25% slower than the desktop RX 560: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-560-vs-AMD-Radeon-Pro-560X/3926vsm541446

oh. wow. i guess i have yo refund this sack of craps

[Red™]

That is strange. This laptop is perfectly capable for running Arkham knight at least 30 FPS, not bloody two. I try to get it to play at the lowest setting possible, I still get 2 FPS.

[Red™]

I forgot to set the game at dx10. I’ll try that setting soon

[Red™]

Originally posted by Ancient:

https://www.amd.com/en/support/kb/faq/dh-017

And yeah, the Radeon Pro 560X (there is no such thing as an RX 560X), even if working normally, is pretty weak. It falls slightly below the min spec GTX 660 and well below the recommended GTX 760: https://imgur.com/WWPBSOB

It's a mobile chip, after all. It's around 20-25% slower than the desktop RX 560: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-560-vs-AMD-Radeon-Pro-560X/3926vsm541446

Nope. RX560x existed

[Ancient]

Yeah you should definitely be getting more like 30-50 FPS at 1080p. I thought you meant you were getting that and thought it was low FPS (it is to me).

Even the Vega 8 is capable of 30-ish FPS on 768p/low.

Originally posted by Red Son:

Nope. RX560x existed

Yeah, you're right I was rather hurriedly looking for benchmarks and couldn't find any for an RX 560X, but there are are some.

I guess the Radeon Pro 560X was an Apple-only chip used in Macbooks and iMacs. From what benchmarks I can find though, it would seem the RX 560X is actually a little bit weaker than that.

Radeon Pro 560X vs GTX 660: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-660-vs-AMD-Radeon-Pro-560X/2162vsm541446

RX 560X vs GTX 660: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/RX-560X-vs-Nvidia-GTX-660/m753980vs2162

You should of course be getting way more than 2 FPS on either the Vega 8 or the RX 560X though.

[RipperG]

Originally posted by Seamus:

Well, your gpu just barely makes the recommended specs, so... turn some settings down?

lol im running this game on R7 250x 2g of vram and i3 3gen lol the problem is the game , its not well optimized so i used the batman tweak app

[Red™]

Originally posted by Ancient:

Yeah you should definitely be getting more like 30-50 FPS at 1080p. I thought you meant you were getting that and thought it was low FPS (it is to me).

Even the Vega 8 is capable of 30-ish FPS on 768p/low.

Originally posted by Red Son:

Nope. RX560x existed

Yeah, you're right I was rather hurriedly looking for benchmarks and couldn't find any for an RX 560X, but there are are some.

I guess the Radeon Pro 560X was an Apple-only chip used in Macbooks and iMacs. From what benchmarks I can find though, it would seem the RX 560X is actually a little bit weaker than that.

Radeon Pro 560X vs GTX 660: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-660-vs-AMD-Radeon-Pro-560X/2162vsm541446

RX 560X vs GTX 660: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/RX-560X-vs-Nvidia-GTX-660/m753980vs2162

You should of course be getting way more than 2 FPS on either the Vega 8 or the RX 560X though.

Ah thanks for the reply on this. I already fixed it by tweaking around the performance for GPU and now I’m getting a good performance, with configs on as well

[Seamus]

Originally posted by RipperG (◕‿◕)♡:

Originally posted by Seamus:

Well, your gpu just barely makes the recommended specs, so... turn some settings down?

lol im running this game on R7 250x 2g of vram and i3 3gen lol the problem is the game , its not well optimized so i used the batman tweak app

You're blaming the game optimization when you're using a card that's barely half the power of the MINIMUM on the store page?

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ you're stupid.