Batman™: Arkham Knight

Batman™: Arkham Knight

View Stats:
Zooasaurus Jan 26, 2018 @ 3:53pm
Can this game run on my low tier PC?
I want to buy this game in continuation of Arkham City, but it's very demanding so i wonder if i can run it
Nvidia GT 480
Intel i3-3240
4 gb ram
< >
Showing 1-13 of 13 comments
Stefan Jan 26, 2018 @ 11:05pm 
No. Keep your money

Minimum:

Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system
OS: Win 7 SP1, Win 8.1 (64-bit Operating System Required)
Processor: Intel Core i5-750, 2.67 GHz | AMD Phenom II X4 965, 3.4 GHz
Memory: 6 GB RAM
Graphics: Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 (2 GB Memory Minimum) | AMD Radeon HD 7870 (2 GB Memory Minimum)
Last edited by Stefan; Jan 26, 2018 @ 11:07pm
BT Jan 27, 2018 @ 3:33am 
are you sure that your VGA is GT480? as far as I remember, 3rd generation intel proc should in the same era of geforce 600m series not 400m series..
Stormspark Jan 27, 2018 @ 1:48pm 
Originally posted by BT:
are you sure that your VGA is GT480? as far as I remember, 3rd generation intel proc should in the same era of geforce 600m series not 400m series..
Wouldn't matter. The rest of the system is so far under the minimum requirements it wouldn't matter if it was a 1080ti. The game would literally not even launch on that system.
BT Jan 27, 2018 @ 5:58pm 
hey.. i once played this game on i7-3612qm laptop with 8gb of ram and geforce GT640m.

I didn't get solid 30 fps even at kowest resolution that time but it ran and it's playable.
Stormspark Jan 27, 2018 @ 9:19pm 
Originally posted by BT:
hey.. i once played this game on i7-3612qm laptop with 8gb of ram and geforce GT640m.

I didn't get solid 30 fps even at kowest resolution that time but it ran and it's playable.
Yeah and that machine is over twice as powerful as what the OP posted.
BT Jan 27, 2018 @ 11:00pm 
well, even if mine is i7, it was a low voltage version and wasn't that powerful.

I once plugged RX480 as eGPU on this laptop, and this game ran solid 60fps at 900p low/med setting, so I thought this game is more GPU intensive than CPU.
Zooasaurus Jan 28, 2018 @ 2:46am 
Then how about Origins? It shouldn't be as demanding as this right?
TNX. Jan 28, 2018 @ 4:20am 
Originally posted by Zooasaurus:
Then how about Origins? It shouldn't be as demanding as this right?
Origins is pretty demanding as well. You should definitely upgrade your computer. It will not run Origins or any other bigger game at the FPS as well as graphical settings you desire.

Upgrading is a must if you want to play without any problems.
Zooasaurus Jan 28, 2018 @ 5:30am 
Originally posted by TNovix:
Originally posted by Zooasaurus:
Then how about Origins? It shouldn't be as demanding as this right?
Origins is pretty demanding as well. You should definitely upgrade your computer. It will not run Origins or any other bigger game at the FPS as well as graphical settings you desire.

Upgrading is a must if you want to play without any problems.
Well, upgrading PC is hella expensive and can't really save money lol. Even more so with hiking GPU prices
Oh well, i guess Origins will run wuth little problems at least. I can run City in High with no problems
lucasj1210 Jan 28, 2018 @ 7:50am 
Originally posted by Zooasaurus:
Oh well, i guess Origins will run wuth little problems at least. I can run City in High with no problems
Well both City and Origins will run on 32bit OS and Dual core CPU....Arkham Knight is the first Arkham game that required a 64bit OS and at least a Quad core CPU..
If City ran for you then Origins SHOULD.
trek554 Jan 28, 2018 @ 7:16pm 
Originally posted by Zooasaurus:
I want to buy this game in continuation of Arkham City, but it's very demanding so i wonder if i can run it
Nvidia GT 480
Intel i3-3240
4 gb ram
why are you even looking at modern games when you only have a 4gb of system ram? even gaming comps from 10 freaking years ago had 4gb of ram. and already in 2011, 8gb would have been common if not the norm for gaming pc. hell there are phones out there from last year with 4gb of ram or more. demanding modern games for the last several years haved needed a minimum of 8gb with 16gb being a good idea. even the devs for this game said a minimum of 12gb is really needed to prevent stuttering.

and I assume you mean gtx 480. that card only has 1.5 gb of vram which has not cut it for the last several years. plus when you run out of vram you will use system ram which you do not even have enough of anyway. and why in the hell have you held on to that relic? you should have never bought that overpriced power hungry noisy pos in the first place. and you should have at least sold it when it was worth something. now even a $100 video card can run rings around it in modern games while using a tiny fraction of the power.



Last edited by trek554; Jan 28, 2018 @ 7:17pm
The Brown Hornet Jan 28, 2018 @ 7:19pm 
Originally posted by Zooasaurus:
I want to buy this game in continuation of Arkham City, but it's very demanding so i wonder if i can run it
Nvidia GT 480
Intel i3-3240
4 gb ram
Play City, Asylum, Origins instead
Originally posted by TNX.:
Originally posted by Zooasaurus:
Then how about Origins? It shouldn't be as demanding as this right?
Origins is pretty demanding as well. You should definitely upgrade your computer. It will not run Origins or any other bigger game at the FPS as well as graphical settings you desire.

Upgrading is a must if you want to play without any problems.

I can run origins just fine but i cant run arkham knight. Havent tried to actually get the game and run it but most sites say i cant and im not willing to risk it tbh
I have a NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 Intel Core i3-3220 and 8 gb ram
< >
Showing 1-13 of 13 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jan 26, 2018 @ 3:53pm
Posts: 13