Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I got this (along with the dlc) for £7 on a sale btw.
I had a look at your profile, you have 38 hours in this - half way through by your own admission. So even with the argument of the game being bad and not worth it, it was clearly worth it enough to spend a massive amount of time engaging with it.
I also picked this up on discount (£7 including DLC) and have 48 hours in it.
Find it very difficult to sympathize. Perhaps if I bought it on launch? But in it's current state, no problems. Mostly a joy.
That's member berry logic. PS1 games were short, even Final Fantasy 7 for example , you could do every single thing, max your characters, complete the story, defeat Emerald and Ruby weapons in 35 hours. I've played about 70 hours on Arkham Knight, took my time, explored, did most of the side quests etc, it's like the people who complain about RE7 being short, but then you have to remind them that you could finish Resident Evil on PS1 on a Saturday afternoon
he could've spent 37 of those 38 hours sitting in the main menu while playing Club Penguin on his laptop instead... you have no way of knowing that...:-)