Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
1. it was Batman. he didn't die, and the resurrection aspect only made him scarier for criminals.
2. it was a successor of what Batman stood for. could be Jason Todd or Azrael or anyone who felt that return of Batman was necessary.
3. it was a manifestation of Batman's legacy. Criminals are feeling his presence even after he's presumably dead. now Batman is literally haunting the superstitious and cowardly.
or it could be all of the above. the overall implication is that Batman is indeed gone for the moment, but his absence will be temporary. in the "GCPD Lockdown" DLC, Nightwing even explicitly says "this is temporary" in response to a GCPD officer suggesting maybe they should change the symbol in the Bat signal.
Officially, Bruce most definitely did not die, as the notion of taking out Alfred with him is preposterous, and blowing up Wayne manor seems to be a great elaborate statement for the world rather than a fitting exile method Batman would have chosen.
This is confirmed by the fact that the rest of the Bat family (Tim, Barbara, and Nightwing) seems to be taking the "deaths" of Bruce Wayne and Alfred very well in the DLCs- so much so that non of them seems to be even slightly emotionally effected by it, while they continue to have casual conversations discussing the aftermath of Batman no longer being around. (Nightwing even pokes fun at Lucius saying "so I guess you're a billionaire now that the CEO is gone and you're in charge of the company")
The purpose of the Knightfall Protocol would have been to kill off Bruce Wayne, should Batman's identity be compromised to the public. It's a reasonable countermeasure, seeing how if Bruce Wayne is dead consequences of Batman's identity being known is no longer all that significant. now, Bruce no longer has to be Bruce Wayne anymore. It was always clear that Bruce Wayne was the made-up persona while Batman was his true self in all iterations of Batman. the take, would be that he has to give up his life as Bruce Wayne. sure, Batman may be his true self but Bruce Wayne is his true identity. I think it's the ultimate sacrifice (in a way, more so than actually giving up his life) that I don't think we have seen in a Batman story before. (him giving up the cowl we've seen before but never killing off Bruce Wayne. well, The Dark Knight Rises perhaps, but in that film he also retired permanently)
Thanks again.
I don't remember if it's a dialogue with Alfred or Catwoman but Bruce said that Batman had to die so something else would be born of his ashes, something worse (I think the word he uses is worse). So it has to be the first (it was Batman), he planned it all along. What is open for interpretation is what this worse would be, he comes back as something else that somehow is more effective than Batman. Maybe the figure of a ressurected Batman really is more powerful, maybe he will change his modus operandi, do things that Batman wouldn't do, who knows.
In the GCPD lockdown, I think what Nightwing meant is that he acting in Gotham was temporary, since he acts in Blüdhaven. I don't think anyone is aware of Bruce's plan, only Alfred knew of the Knightfall protocol and I think not even him knew of Bruce's plan to return after that. They are aware that Bruce is alive and that he faked his and Alfred's death but they probably merely deduced that and don't have any real information.
the 'batman' died' ...