So if you don't steal the food out of the stranger's car what happens?

[Steven Chilton]

if you don't steal it i assume someone else in your party does and he blames you because it does that alot in the game

[MysticcMarcel]

nobody comes you just take the food and a pullover for clem.But Clem is a little bit angry because you just took the food but she dont care about it after some time :D

[MorningLightMountain]

It depends if you convince her she isn't angry.

[Steven Chilton]

what no i want to know what happens if you don't steal the food like choose not to what happens

[MorningLightMountain]

Originally posted by (+TeCh+) ᴵᶰᵗᵉʳᶰᵉᵗ ᴾᵒᶫᶦᶜᵉ:

what no i want to know what happens if you don't steal the food like choose not to what happens

The exact same thing the rest of the group take the food regardless of Lee's input.

[Steven Chilton]

Originally posted by MorningLightMountain:

Originally posted by (+TeCh+) ᴵᶰᵗᵉʳᶰᵉᵗ ᴾᵒᶫᶦᶜᵉ:

what no i want to know what happens if you don't steal the food like choose not to what happens

The exact same thing the rest of the group take the food regardless of Lee's input.

but does the stranger still blame him even if he does nothing?

[Vzzdak]

It's a moral choice that serves to colour your story, per what you choose to do. Go with what you feel is appropriate. It won't limit your options later; it will merely, again, colour your story.

[Satsujinki]

I chose not to steal the supplies because I thought I was suppose to make right decisions.

[Vzzdak]

Originally posted by Satsujinki:

I chose not to steal the supplies because I thought I was suppose to make right decisions.

That's subjective. I chose to take the abandoned food because it appeared that the owner had been driven off and killed by zombies. If I was thinking straight, I would have taken the vehicle too. If someone wanted the supplies back, then they could have asked me for them.

[Satsujinki]

Originally posted by Vzzdak:

Originally posted by Satsujinki:

I chose not to steal the supplies because I thought I was suppose to make right decisions.

That's subjective. I chose to take the abandoned food because it appeared that the owner had been driven off and killed by zombies. If I was thinking straight, I would have taken the vehicle too. If someone wanted the supplies back, then they could have asked me for them.

Mmm....I think my morale would tell me if I take the supplies, then the owner wouldn't mind them and they were killed by zombies.

[NecroMaster]

He doesnt critisize you for the stealing from his car.
But he does critisize you for things that are beyond your control.
Saving Carley or Doug over the other which you have to do you get critisized for.
Just going to the Saint Johns farm he will critisize you for that.

He pretty much just comes up with reasons to kill you even if youve done nothing wrong the whole way.

[HarꓷꓓieseL]

i didnt stole from his car anything and he still blamed me for everything that has happened to him.

[Vzzdak]

Originally posted by Wilson the Gentleman Scientist.:

He doesnt critisize you for the stealing from his car.
But he does critisize you for things that are beyond your control.
[...]
He pretty much just comes up with reasons to kill you even if youve done nothing wrong the whole way.

Originally posted by ivanbelic011:

i didnt stole from his car anything and he still blamed me for everything that has happened to him.

Now we're getting into spoiler territory because the OP seemed to have only just completed chapter 2.

There was a recent thread that asked if anything could be done to appease that guy, and the consensus was no, he makes whatever claims he can to justify his behaviour.

[Steven Chilton]

Originally posted by Vzzdak:

Originally posted by Wilson the Gentleman Scientist.:

He doesnt critisize you for the stealing from his car.
But he does critisize you for things that are beyond your control.
[...]
He pretty much just comes up with reasons to kill you even if youve done nothing wrong the whole way.

Originally posted by ivanbelic011:

i didnt stole from his car anything and he still blamed me for everything that has happened to him.

Now we're getting into spoiler territory because the OP seemed to have only just completed chapter 2.

There was a recent thread that asked if anything could be done to appease that guy, and the consensus was no, he makes whatever claims he can to justify his behaviour.

what no i beat the game how would i know what he would critisize me on if i never got to him
i've beat both games

[Vzzdak]

Originally posted by (+TeCh+) pangender polysexual:

what no i beat the game how would i know what he would critisize me on if i never got to him
i've beat both games

Ah, okay. From your initial post, it sounded like you hadn't finished the game, yet.

There's a recent thread where someone was asking what were the different responses from the guy, per your actions. I can't see to find the thread. However, even if you do things "morally well," the guy essentially accuses you putting the girl in jeopardy (i.e., for being attacked in situations where you had no control).

[TentacleMayor]

I like how he accuses Lee of taking Clem along to Crawford. Well no ♥♥♥♥, that's because there was this creepy stalker who'd been talking to her on the walkie and who obviously wanted to take her.