nothing change...

[Donuay]

Dev adjust outpost respawn to 1 min but I think they also adjust the drop rate too.

I successfully finished the Outpost infiltration 40 times with sharen (it took like 50 minutes)
Here is the result : ONLY 4 amorphous material that I got, yea that right 4 out of 40

[Maya-Neko]

We could calculate how likely that is to happen and why you've not proven anything, but i guess you're not interested in a statistical approach anyway

[Donuay]

let try

Originally posted by Maya-Neko:

We could calculate how likely that is to happen and why you've not proven anything, but i guess you're not interested in a statistical approach anyway

[Noop]

This is why you pay attention in class kids.

[MutoManiac]

I bought $75 worth of Descendants to support the game since it’s very good, I’m not buying an energy activator for ~1200 caliber though. I also did a whole bunch of infiltrations with Sharen and got nothing. RNG needs to change or a lot of players will leave. And just to clarify, the rng is ok except for the amorphous relics for the energy activator 6% ones.

[Dyspeptic Icarus]

Originally posted by Donuay:

Dev adjust outpost respawn to 1 min but I think they also adjust the drop rate too.

I successfully finished the Outpost infiltration 40 times with sharen (it took like 50 minutes)
Here is the result : ONLY 4 amorphous material that I got, yea that right 4 out of 40

4 out of 40 is a 10% chance. Divide it by 4, and it's obvious. 1 out of 10.

This is the average. Come back in 10,000 Outpost runs, and if it's drastically different than the on-screen drop rate, then maybe you'll have an argument.

[alan0n]

Originally posted by Plutocron:

Originally posted by Donuay:

Dev adjust outpost respawn to 1 min but I think they also adjust the drop rate too.

I successfully finished the Outpost infiltration 40 times with sharen (it took like 50 minutes)
Here is the result : ONLY 4 amorphous material that I got, yea that right 4 out of 40

4 out of 40 is a 10% chance.

Do it 10,000 times. I bet it comes out different.

[feetlover16]

I got a 20% freyna material drop after 40 tries. People told me they got it in 1-3 tries. Do you know what the R in rng stands for?

[Donuay]

Originally posted by Plutocron:

Originally posted by Donuay:

Dev adjust outpost respawn to 1 min but I think they also adjust the drop rate too.

I successfully finished the Outpost infiltration 40 times with sharen (it took like 50 minutes)
Here is the result : ONLY 4 amorphous material that I got, yea that right 4 out of 40

4 out of 40 is a 10% chance. Divide it by 4, and it's obvious. 1 out of 10.

This is the average. Come back in 10,000 Outpost runs, and if it's drastically different than the on-screen drop rate, then maybe you'll have an argument.

Oh I get it for my case is 10% which it is between 5%-25% that say in Acquisition chance
feel right it reasonable

[Dyspeptic Icarus]

Originally posted by Donuay:

Originally posted by Plutocron:

4 out of 40 is a 10% chance. Divide it by 4, and it's obvious. 1 out of 10.

This is the average. Come back in 10,000 Outpost runs, and if it's drastically different than the on-screen drop rate, then maybe you'll have an argument.

Oh I get it for my case is 10% which it is between 5%-25% that say in Acquisition chance
feel right it reasonable

If you want to get technical, if it's two 20% chances exclusive from one another the chance you don't get it in 5 runs is <50%.

If you don't get in 20 runs, that's less than 10% iirc.

---

However, that's luck. The chance it doesn't happen can always occur, so it's hard to actually compile data on it.

For example, if you were to find out if a 25% chance drop was accurate, you'd need to do 250,000 runs. (if it's two different 25% drops in one run, you could do ~100,000.)

Any less, and it's hard to find out the true accuracy. IIRC, to find the true accuracy of 99% you'd need close to a million, it gets harder to find edge percents like this with few samples. So 1.5%/3%/9%, it's the same.

What actually matters is how often you do it. Do it 100 times, you'll gain a lot comparatively, and your chance of getting a bunch of them is much higher than someone who only did it 5 times.

+X% compounds easily af. Do a 1% chance drop twice, and it's now a 1.01% chance. Twice, and it's 1.021%, again ~2%, and so on and so on, but each time, you still have that 1% chance rolled, your just a little more likely when doing it in sets.

---

The one thing I learned in Pokemon, anything under 80% accuracy; expect it to not hit. You're trolling yourself if you rely on it.

[MysticalPotato]

Originally posted by Donuay:

Dev adjust outpost respawn to 1 min but I think they also adjust the drop rate too.

I successfully finished the Outpost infiltration 40 times with sharen (it took like 50 minutes)
Here is the result : ONLY 4 amorphous material that I got, yea that right 4 out of 40

Nope, they did not. Stop talking poop. It's just fine.

[MysticalPotato]

Originally posted by Plutocron:

Originally posted by Donuay:

Dev adjust outpost respawn to 1 min but I think they also adjust the drop rate too.

I successfully finished the Outpost infiltration 40 times with sharen (it took like 50 minutes)
Here is the result : ONLY 4 amorphous material that I got, yea that right 4 out of 40

4 out of 40 is a 10% chance. Divide it by 4, and it's obvious. 1 out of 10.

This is the average. Come back in 10,000 Outpost runs, and if it's drastically different than the on-screen drop rate, then maybe you'll have an argument.

Technically, but 40 runs is not enough to verify 10%. That's simply not how it works.

[дух]

i have proof the RNG implementation in unreal engine 4 and 5 is faulty, so whatever it says, its something completely different.

UE is not that great of an engine, when u commit to making a game in it u are making a lot of sacrifices.

if anyone has UE, just look at the random implement library, you will see

edit1: it seems they used a real seed for the random, if anyone into mathematics you will know what i mean, which makes sense they have access to real seeds with samsung and all

[JohnMiller92]

Originally posted by Gospon Sir Burek:

i have proof the RNG implementation in unreal engine 4 and 5 is faulty, so whatever it says, its something completely different.

UE is not that great of an engine, when u commit to making a game in it u are making a lot of sacrifices.

if anyone has UE, just look at the random implement library, you will see

that's assuming they are using UE for their gameserver and that you can see their source code. the rolls are server-side.

what point are you trying to make?

[~Lazy_Eggs~]

Originally posted by Donuay:

Originally posted by Plutocron:

4 out of 40 is a 10% chance. Divide it by 4, and it's obvious. 1 out of 10.

This is the average. Come back in 10,000 Outpost runs, and if it's drastically different than the on-screen drop rate, then maybe you'll have an argument.

Oh I get it for my case is 10% which it is between 5%-25% that say in Acquisition chance
feel right it reasonable

Yeah, for you it's a 10% drop "rate"

But the game is really random number generator (RNG)

Meaning you roll a dice Everytime for the lewts.

So out of a 100 roll. U need to roll numbers between 7-20 to get the 20% drop "chance"

The numbers vary depending on what type of drops is in the loot table.

No one knows exactly what is in the loot table encompasses or if you just need to roll a number between 1-20

[Northguard]

A 20% chance to get something means there's an 80% chance of not getting it.