Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Some people blame UE5 but my other UE5 games dont cause this either.
2024: people complain their multicore cpus are being utilized
Using all cores should lead to lower use% / core not 90% on every core.... The whole point was to make it efficient not waste more power for nothing.
Some may need to be asked this...but do you have unnecessary software running at the same time? Are you sure your CPU is powerful enough to fully utilize the GPU? Depending on your activity online, are you sure you have no malware or other crap like that, which steals system resources? Are you sure the graphical settings are right for your computers specifications?
I have all graphics settings on high, with DLSS for quality. With a 2560x1080 resolution.
My GPU is a 3070TI. It occasionally peak to 100% which makes my game stutter for a second or two. It usually stay between 75-95% usage with a framerate between 70 and 90.
In addition i have a bunch of software runing at the same time, including my browser with a dusin tabs open.
yeah ran amazing in beta for me as well, now it just runs like garbage, when doing the waves ops i can get locked up when everything spawns, even dropped my settings to low and it'll still lock up for a couple seconds when the "mass" waves come in. i dunno what they changed but my pc hates it.
Because other games dont need to run at 90% and this game is an outlier on the bad end.
I'm buying the newest hardware not to heat my room wasting processing power but to keep fans silent running at low load. Instead we get devs using it as an opportunity to write ♥♥♥♥♥♥ code running badly. If you think about it our computers got much faster but even simple office software runs just as bad as decades ago. Why? Garbage code. In gaming instead of getting better performance from new tech like framegen you merely have worse optimized games hiding behind framegen&dlss ending in zero benefits at your end. You could write an entire doctor thesis on the crimes against performance committed by modern developers. Consumers need to praise the good ones and berate the bad ones because otherwise there is zero motivation to address this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW4HjWF_wYU start at 2:03
I personally think that the max should 90% to leave some breathing room for everything else.
LOL no, i have a Ryzen 7, and the same gpu as you. and i dunno what dusin is.
CPU utilization has nothing to do with heat. If you want to limit heat, limit input power. CPUs already do it by themselves, Intel's default limit is 125W. And laptops sit around 50W. Set it to 30W and you will get by with passive cooling. There, problem solved.
What you are attempting to do is to buy 32 cars for 32 people and then only allow to use one of them, just so the "cars utilization" number looks low 🤦😕 and then complain about inefficiency of modern society.
The reply is worthless for you.
For everyone else.
The three most common reason why CPU are heavily used or spike in a game, is if the CPU is to old or starting to, other software running at the same time and or malware/viruses/etc, or you are playing a simulation game that primarily uses the CPU for simulating the game. Like Cities Skyline. Which can max out the most powerful CPUs.
Also if your CPU is to weak/old for your graphics card, the CPU will become a bottleneck and will affect your system performance. And at last. Some games are made to run well on single core and other games on multicore. I assume this game is made to run well on multicore.
Sure the game have bugs and not exactly super optimized. But I don't se CPU issues. I see GPU issues. I see badly optimized graphics. In the title screen (as of writing) for example the game runs steadily at 25% CPU and a crazy 99% GPU for no reason.
while playing, my CPU is average 40% with a 5% pluss/minus deviation. While my graphics card is randomly spiking to 100% and freezes the image for 1-3 seconds. This is similar to my CPU and GPU usage in Cyberpunk 2077. where the difference is that half my graphics settings are ultra.
And here is another thing.
VENDONS CPU for example is a i7-6700K. This CPU is from Q3'2015. Thats over 9 years ago. Its a grandpa. This CPU is so old that there are newer Intel i5 CPUs that are more powerfuil. The i7-14700K, which is the 2023 version is twice as powerful as the i7-6700K.
And then the terms minimum and recommended requirements. As long as the CPU can run a software+operating system and it functions, it is within the recommended spec. Dont know what the avg is on VENDONS cpu. But 70-90% CPU usage is indeed within recomended, and therefore nothing abnormal. Even if the settings are on the lowest.