Do you use certain inclinations just because you prefer their voice?

[Arthur Morrigan]

I keep my pawn on simple, simply because the actors for the other inclinations are terrible actors, and/or severely annoying.

[Rena Ichigawa]

There is a reason i gave my pawn the aphone specialty. Sorcerer that doesnt aggressivel cast death upon the enemies feels like a waste, but straightforward talks like such an a-hole

[Urtoar]

yeah i like straight forward tho

[President Fluffy Tail]

Calm and simple are my favorite. Simple’s lines are fantastic, downside is simple pawns require constant supervision. I like straightforward too. Kindhearted i don’t know just doesn’t mesh with me.

[Arbadacarba]

This makes me think I should try the others out, currently using simple.

[Teddio]

I love kindhearted personally. Simple is a bit distant second.

[Dust]

I like all the voices, but I just can't stand female kindhearted somehow. Sounds amateurish to me. Not gonna hire any pawn with this inclination voice.

[Aurelia]

Sadly yes. And i hate it. It's the one major complaint i've always had with the customization. They really shouldn't have done this. The voice my pawn has is a perfect fit for her, but it doesn't truely match her vocation/role.

[Netsa]

Absolutely, yes. Chose my starting inclination based only on that surly-sounding voice, didn't look back. Straightforward represent.

[Arthur Morrigan]

Originally posted by Aurelia:

Sadly yes. And i hate it. It's the one major complaint i've always had with the customization. They really shouldn't have done this. The voice my pawn has is a perfect fit for her, but it doesn't truely match her vocation/role.

This game is too easy to worry too much about min/maxing. They really should've separated voice and inclination, though.

I would rather my pawn have a voice I enjoy listening to and be suboptimal, than be more efficient but sound like he's reading off cue cards for my entire adventure.

[Ragnalus]

Japanese audio sounds much better than the English ones

[Aurelia]

Originally posted by Lord forgive me:

Originally posted by Aurelia:

Sadly yes. And i hate it. It's the one major complaint i've always had with the customization. They really shouldn't have done this. The voice my pawn has is a perfect fit for her, but it doesn't truely match her vocation/role.

This game is too easy to worry too much about min/maxing. They really should've separated voice and inclination, though.

I would rather my pawn have a voice I enjoy listening to and be suboptimal, than be more efficient but sound like he's reading off cue cards for my entire adventure.

It's not about min/maxing. It's that if I wish for my pawn to be more aggressive based on how i envision them, i want them to be as such.
I was lucky that the voice that I really liked was atleast mid-stage for the role, and is atleast acceptably suitable. I couldn't imagine if the voice I wanted was the "I stay next to you so you get hit by every attack that comes my way" vocation.

[Dollmaker]

Yeah, but seriously, behavior shouldnt be tied to the voice.

[Wraithverge]

"I found it myself!" ^^

guilty as charged, the voice dictated the inclination but I'm not really bothered by that.

[Justinyl]

They should not tie voices to inclination.

Oops forgot to type not after should.

[Sgt. Magnusson]

I changed my pawn's inclination because he annoyed me. Not just the voice, but the dialogue too. I think it's very weird that they decided to tie voices to inclinations.