Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Back from Wikiland... You're kind of right. It wasn't Henry though who was switching sides. At least, not at the deciding battle. However, one of the commanding nobles (Earl of Northumberland) of Richard III's army refused to engage the enemy, either for personal or strategic reasons.
What apperently decided the battle was the involvement of Lord Stanley. His army was present, but his allegiance was not clear.
When Richard personally engaged and tried to capture and kill Henry, Stanley sided with Henry and came to his aid. Richard was swept from his horse, and killed. After the battle Henry was proclaimed King.
Battle of Bosworth Field: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Bosworth_Field#Engagement
And historically quite a few lords would change sides as and when it suited them. This was particuarly a problem in the various wars between England and Scotland, those who lived on the borders tended to feel seperate from both sides. They would often end up crossing the ranks to join the other side if it suited them, and very often would fight their fellow borderer "allies" mid battle due to ongoing feuds.
It really depended on the lord, his sense of honour and loyalty.
Either way... back having fun. After 4 generations I've managed to put England back together after the decades of warfare between William's children.