Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Adding China would mean adding Siberia, The Eurasian Steppes, Indo-china, etc. This would make the map three times bigger than it is now. This would also mean thousands of new charchaters, possibly millions endgame. This would be a nightmare.
CK2 focuses on the Medieval era in Europe. It feels strange to me they added India. I think China and it's religions is beter kept for another game.
But nevertheless, here are my thoughts.
Too OP. This would 'cheat' on well establisched game mechanic's. It would be beter they started of with the tech required and laws set to Viceroyalties like the Byzantine Empire.
What?
I understand why but no. This would make it way to easy to "farm" points.
Why? Do you just want an easy way to play?
What?
Both break l establisched mechanic's. Religion would be beter if done like in india "patron god"-Idea as replacement for heresies/different interpretations.
why not..Crusader Kings not only for europe but round the world..as long they have land and the king...Martial~diplomacy~stewardship~intrigue~learning..Thumb Up
In China, especially between year 769 (Tang Dynasty)- 1453 (Ming Dynasty), Vassal kings or dukes were only granted to some borderland provinces, most of the rich and populated region are under "Cival servants" control.
These "cival servants" were selected annually from a national exam, the top 20 will be granted position in provinces and top3 in capital.(sometimes even chose as potential husbands of princesses, if they are both handsome and lucky)
What?
Confuzism stresses the importance of absolute hierarchy in both country and family, under no circumstances shall a junior member behave against senior one. Although such actions happened no fewer than one hundred times in written history, their undeeds are seriously criticised by both the people and the historians after their time.
I understand why but no. This would make it way to easy to "farm" points.
The temple of Confuzism is simply school, and those of taosim were like alchemy lab based temple...
Why? Do you just want an easy way to play?
This is my fault, I tried to express otherwise but failed to finish my thoughs
What?
It's like in EU, if one country lacks strong or competence leader, neighbouring country can declare conquest war.
But on second thought, it's not of great use...
Both break l establisched mechanic's. Religion would be beter if done like in india "patron god"-Idea as replacement for heresies/different interpretations. [/quote]
Chinese people really don't give a damn about what other people believe, as long as they are not cultist or interfare with their own lives. The majorities of population believe in higher power and don't care what his/her/their names is/are.
In history, there were only a handful of religous rebelion in China, of which 3 are most well-known. 2 of them were Buddists and Taoists trying to build a government in unification of the state and the church, the last one is in Qing Dynasty which some cultists claiming to be Jesus Christ incarnation but actually never read the Bible....Their version of Christism is more like greek myth
China could very easily be the subject of a whole historical strategy game unto itself, or possibly even a total conversion of CK2 which utterly replaces most of its mechanics.
agreed, Chinese Empire was more like Roman empire, with most of the lands controled by viceroyalty or governor-general