Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
and women are way strong than u think as well. at best id put a minus 5 to prowess.
"Men vs Women Punching Power Study: Male average power during a punching motion was 162% greater than females', with the least-powerful man still stronger than the most powerful woman."
first result google
I honestly tried to get something on that topic searching google and not just going with the first result, after one of those "its so unrealistic that there are female fighters"-discussion (in a fantasy world so not a historical argument), what I found that sounded not wholy driven by agendas, still ranged from about a 30%+ in case of men on average, to stuff like your cited 2.5 times as strong. Thats to say internet-sources aren't really reliable for that, even if you try to filter out the worst agenda-driven stuff (from "there is NO difference at all" to "women, I don't even know how they can support their own body-weight given how weak they are, should stay in the kitchen anyways")
Btw. especially "punching power" is a really bad meter for that, since we have a culture that discourages most girls / women from said punching so most of the test-subjects have some inhibitions about punching and tend to pull their punch even when its not another being thats targeted. Meaning for a real test you should take for example male and female professional boxers of the respective weight-classes cause you can get rid of that factor.
I suspect you'd still have a difference then but way less spectacular then a factor of 1:2.5.
Are you trying to clown farm?
So a 1.5 meter shrimp with no muscle mass can punch a world class female boxer dead, because of the magical power of having a penis.... sure buddy
Boxing's rules & in particular its gloves slows blows, makes defending hits with blocks easier & much more. All of this combines to eliminate the inherit luck that is involved in bare knuckle boxing & UFC. Meaning the most skilled boxer can usually win bouts reliably.
Very few MMA fighters go undefeated even in their prime unlike boxers.
Bladed combat is even more of a crap shoot, if you train a woman into bladed combat she will be far more successful than a male who is not.
Female fencers although generally sub par to males are still able to reliably score points against them, ie kill them. Very few fencers go undefeated.
If anything females at max should gain -5 to combat score but no where near that of a dwarf.
Bladed duelling is a crapshoot irl when combatants are even remotely matched. What you've saw in the movies is absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, watch fencing to see how boring and really luck dependent dueling with swords is when both people are trained.
I think CK2 combat scoring is great, it is completely fesiable for a 10 personal combat scored char to kill a 200 scored one, those who do not understand odds come to these forums and make fools of themselves at least once per month. I feel the system fully accounts for the crapshoot that is IRL bladed dueling.