Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Edit: A Khazar nomand named Beaumont would just 'break immersion' for me.
Same here! I tend to introduce some custom culturally linked names in the beginning of the dynasty and am always pleasantly suprised when down the line I see the names resurface every now and then! I personally also like to introduce names from the mother's culture, if the child is not the result of a matrilinial marriage (retaining the voided culture in name).
So a son might be named after my character's friend or brother or father or grandfather or mentor. If my character is zealous or otherwise a pious person than my children might have the names of saints. If my character is ambitious or has big dreams for the dyasty than the heir will be named after a past great person. Additionally, I will make a point to never name my children after a rival character.
For example, I was playing one game as Tancred, Duke of Galilee (one of the few crusaders in the First Crusade who wasn't a bloothirsty murderer [he even tried to save civilians from the other crusaders during the Sack of Jerusalem]). So I named my first son Adhemar, after a Bishop who participated in the First Crusade in real life. The next son was named Bohemond (after Tancred's uncle who joined the Crusade).