Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's definitely the best horde !
(Ooops, wrong game)
100% light cavalry
74%-50% light cavalry + 26-50% heavy cavalry (I forget what the exact best mix really is, sorry, but IIRC it doesn't matter too much as long as you stay in that range)
100% heavy cavalry
Horse archers are awful. You might have bonuses to HA offense/defense coming out of your ears but they screw up tactics so badly there isn't a point in using them. Camel Cavalry can be used in place of LC - they're more offense-oriented in skirmish and melee but weaker in pursuit.
True. To me. the ultimate army, good in aalll phases would be something around this:
33% camels. 33% Light cavalry, 33% light infantry (of course this setup would be tested, and modified)
Only do Light cav earlygame, or the light/heavy cav retinue.
Sack Constantinople, move capital there and now you can make 100% pure heavy cav units.
Enjoy your deathball.
Horse archers have nice stats in skirmish and pursuit but they screw up your tactics something fierce.
Skirmish phase has tactics for HAs to screw up. With just the right troop balance - that off the top of my head is ridiculously difficult to get - you could maybe be quite good at Skirmish. Otherwise, no, HA will cause tactics to make them worse than LC.
In pursuit HA have 7 attack vs light cavalry with 6 attack and there are no tactics - so HA get a slight win here at least.
Sieges are no longer based on skirmish stats, but instead on melee. LC have much superior melee phase stats.
Sorry, horse archers are awful right now. It costs a lot to get them to come to the party and then they pee in the punch bowl.
My choice right now is heavy infantry. Because i'm playing as Norse :(
And i'm a bit of sad right now since i captured Byzantine princess, which survived ~13 years in my dungeons and turned Byzantine empress... and no "Take Concubine" option avaliable. Sadness. Sadness and lots of heavy infantry.
At the beginning they worked out average because of melee phase, which was not that of a handicap because first wars have been against other nomadic light cavalery and tribe light infantry
After the capitol buildings boni dropped in, nothing can stop them.
Result of a 5k stack vs 5k stack is about 150 losses on my side and opponent loses min 1300.
I waged war against Muslims and just conquered 1/3 of India in one go, fighting against 3 kingdoms at once, with my unused manpower at max all the time.
I don't mix retinues with other troops. Actually I pillage every holding to the ground, so I don't have any to mix with.
I also don't use leaders currently since I don't have enough for all my troops and flanks anyways.
But my leaders are of nomadic culture only (Turkish, Cuman, ...) so they should not mess up the tactics if I would use them.
So far I cannot complain about LC+HA for 25 gold each.