Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
While in some mods (Like the Game of Thrones mod) this is changed, or there is another trait/etc introduced to flag ALL children of incest, the "inbred trait" is only meant to show up on children who are actually suffering the negative effects of inbreeding.
Historically, most royal families were involved in it to some degree, but there's only a couple noteworthy examples of someone ending up with adverse effects (you may have heard of such from Spain, and I think it may have had something to do with George III's famous madness, though I'm not sure on that).
I've played EU4 and I'm asssuming enrique was inbred, spanish prince with the worst stats possible.
...what?
As byzantine you can castrate someone to push him out of the line of succession if you got more of this kind
Differences between brothers and sisters is normal, on could look like his father, the other his grandmother, so one inbred and the others not is not something surprizing.
Of course, if you keep recursively inbreeding for a few generations all bets are off.
"Thanks Paradox but the time for us to part has arrived."
Inbreeding. --> Idiocracy in 500yrs or less. Beware.
chudguy's on a Crusade for General Discussion against PDX-haters.