Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That'd be 70,000,000 :P Agreed way over represented in game. Big league.
That's not even true.
Ferendae sententiae excommunications for homosexuality did not exist until 1179 and applied only to the laity. Prior to the 12th century male homosexuality was dealt with like any other sin. Penance. During the Inquisition homosexuals were not prosecuted unless they challenged the Church's stance on homosexuality.
After the 13th Century, various countries imposed harsh physical punishments such as castration, dismemberment, burning, and property confiscation.
But the whole uproar about the huge number of gay characters is just confirmation bias in my opinion. Like I said, I am gay and I'm actively seacrhing for high-tier gay characters in the game and I'm having great difficulty locating any.
And the screenshot with the little boy and the old man seems like a bug to me. The game treats all people below 16 (wether 0 or 15) as babies.
Having said that, I do believe that the homosexual trait (and several other traits) are treated in a very uninspiring and bland way. They just either add or subtract numbers to some skills or values.
A king-father (expecially a cruel or zealous one) should have options to punish or forgive his kids (gay boys, slutty girls etc) and their lovers like he is able to imprison an unfaithful wife.
It shouldn't be just up to the player to find ways to punish offenders just for RP reasons.
Rivalries can only do so much. They are just reminders of who you should murder but you can just ignore your rivals and nothing happens.
It's definitely not high up on my list of traits I really do not want my leader/heir to have.....interesting special events hehe.
Got to remember that until the monotheistic religions came to the for in Europe in the early dark ages homosexuality or bisexuality was not seen as a sin amongst Roman or Greek civilisations.
Edward II was disliked by the people of England for his weak leadership, which would have seemed particularly puny in stark comparison to the prior, mighty, rule of Longshanks. But, it was his wife, Isabella, that brought about his ultimate downfall. Arranging a foreign army to invade and overthrow your husband and King, is not a decision made lightly. That was obviously an act of treason - but, notably, one that was not disliked by the people, who were generally happy to see the back of Edward II.
And, why did she resort to such an extreme measure? Many reasons. A principal reason being the fact Edward spent more hours within the bed chambers of men (mainly Gaveston), than visiting his own wife in hers. Furthermore, numerous historians speak of the 'hot poker' used to kill the King - why do you think a hot poker up the anus ,would be used against such a man? If the rumours hold any truth, such an act would have been symbolic.
Whether you like it or not, homosexuality would certainly not have been seen as 'okay' during this period. Homosexuality was not even decriminalised in the UK until 1967, for Christ sake.
But anyway, are Paradox games always historically accurate? No, but, they'e thoroughly enjoyable regardless of the fact, and having a higher percentage of homosexuals than is feasible doesn't take anything away from how great CKII is.
Just don't pass off the politically correct alterations to reality as true-to-life - they are not.
i get it. its just not funny.
anectodal eviendnce by my experience would throw the number much higher than 1% or even the standard 4%, and this is living in a conservative county in California.
and i mean, aren't we all a little gay? cmon straight guys, do you want to watch porn where the man has a small unimpressive penis or do you want to see goliath in all his might and splendor
Regardless what is the situation right now doesnt matter, but it would make the game more interesting adding more options and events about those traits.
What do you think I meant by 'repeatedly betrayed his wife'? She was angry because he kept cheating on her and politically crossing her, and she eventually got her revenge. Also, my point was that his vassals tolerated his behavior, and it was his wife who did him in.
Historically speaking, Edward II wouldn't have been considered a homosexual in the first place. A ruler who slept with other men wasn't considered gay as long as he was married and produced children. As long as they produced an heir and treated their vassals properly, their 'indulgences' were ignored. Louis XIII is an excellent example.
huh.
A conservative county in California lmaoooo now thats a good laugh :D
There's more to Cali than just the bay area, you know. The entire northerneastern part of the state is solid red.