Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Well, Thanos is the enabler in that deck. In particular, his stones, which discount Mockingbird, are perfect plays in Hope Summers lane, and enable Hulk Obsidian. Caiera is not even played in the deck after Mockingbird released, and Thanos as turn six play is more often than not a disappointment. I believe they are correct, Thanos is the problem, among others things because the best deck in the game is also the most expensive one.
I really enjoy playing Thanos and Loki, bit I'm afraid Thanos is going to change in a big way.
One they found a turn sequence that works. That is the key, do game mechanics within the construct that you create, work. When you add, or take away cards, how does it effect cards working mechanics. Gamers go to what works. The meta is not created by them, but what they find in key card sequencing that makes a card, work. Then how to strangle your opponent, how to lead him exactly where you want to lead him. They use high percentage plays to take advantage of other constructs. That simple.
He is by far the strongest of the Meta Cards introduced. Galactus, Kang, Thanos, not even close. Why, because he works with the least resistance. His on curve mechanics have much more flexibility than most cards.
Remember how he was implemented, how he was promised, and the cost.
He is now, much more owned by players in the base, he will be a featured spotlight card again. He is still a 6k cost. You better be right if you alter that.
He operated 32nd Rank, 57.2 win/rate and cube rate of .5. He is a powerful meta card due to flexibility of what they have introduced. He also takes skill to play. What gem to use, when, what to add, what to take away.
I deal in facts. I will beat you most of the time with Thanos without getting to turn 6. Stats do not lie. The more they alter in his gem structure, and they have done this due to energy enablers. The more erratic his construct becomes.
How they hurt card mechanics is by adding more steps to a meta card. Instead of one card that does what its suppose to do, they will add an additional step to accomplish the same thing. That is a problem.
To me they are unbalancing his construct to fit what is coming. As I explained what they create in the future. They want to see how this change analytically works before they either go back, or change some more. As I originally stated, dangerous when you do that.
@Zleht-Yeah GOTG got a nice boost, and I think more cards are coming that will force your opponent into the lane. There are currently two in the game, more maybe coming. That too can be overdone. If you are not using Jean Grey and Nebula in your GOTG decks, then I don't know what to tell you. Solid players work around this theme, but the more you add the harder that gets.
I think more than one will make those decks very dangerous. Now, GOTG get maximum power for less guess work. See.
You still have May, June, July, Aug, of around 30 cards that will alter the meta more. We will see. We will adjust.
Thanos is a fantastic construct, but they can ruin him for sure. Absolutely.
Ms. Marvel is a bad card if every other card in your deck is 1 cost.
Knull is a bad card if you don't run it with a single other destroy card. (Well actually, that one can be a really whack but kinda funny tech)
Adam Warlock is a bad card. Just objectively.
Have you tried playing Hela without any discards? It's pretty bad.
Have you tried playing Cull without any 1 drops? It's pretty bad.
Have you tried playing Mockingbird without any cards that don't start in your deck? It's pretty bad.
That's about the worst way to look at a card and judge how powerful it is.
I wouldn't say it's the worst way, it's just not the only way to judge how powerful a card is or the only way to look at it.
Like, if Thanos was really strong without any of his toolkit supports, that also would show just how strong he is.
https://marvelsnapzone.com/tier-list/
Thanos deck with mockingbird dropped to tier 2 recently.
If Thanos is good with certain cards, even if they're just good stuff, you have to evaluate on that. You cannot just remove those cards from the deck, and say Thanos is bad. You need to look at why those cards together are performing extremely well, and it;s because of Thanos.
Literally a better test is to remove Thanos from the deck in question, not Blob and Magneto and all that, and see how it performs in comparison
i saw this video of Regis where he plays deck focused on blob finisher, maybe it's meme, or Blob pre-nerf version? idk but it looks like Blob still is killa without even Thanos.