Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And of course that's aside the usual PM incompetence of putting out broken patches, then fixing them a few hours or days later. Can't do much about those (you'd just be re-downloading their broken patch), but atleast they'll patch up fast.
Man I'm curious about why you keep saying that. I felt like if you go another game it prob this typical that company.
Which I agree on this cause PM is not really good at coding stuff. Bug fix cause more bug.
But it seems like almost all your comment always have the Typical PM at the end. Which is a little bit funny.
Though atleast the previous games weren't money grabbing schemes and beating em was satisfying (and pretty doable if you merely grinded the needed resources), along with nifty world-building. So they had that going for em.
It's just specific companies though, most make either really good, or just really average games that have nothing particularly good or bad to mention.
The guy just really hates the Limbus company is a Gacha but he still plays it for some reason