Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So what are your specs then?
Intel Core i7-9700K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
10GB RAM DDR4
What kind of FPS are you getting? Shouldn't be that bad.
40-50
Sounds about right for those specs, what were you expecting? Despite it's appearance it's still a modern game on a modern engine and is thus heavier than one might expect.
The models are low poly and the graphics consist of just a grading shader for shadows, no way.
Yes way, why do you think the minimum specs are as high as they are for something that looks so low spec?
The engine itself is the issue, everything going on under the hood that isn't even being used.
If you'd ever worked with Unity, you would understand. Bloated engine with some heavyweight overhead, among other issues.
Uhh no.
Meeting the minimum requirements on a store page is literally about specs. You shouldn't expect a game to run well if you don't meet them, and you should reconsider your purchase.
Whether those minimum requirements should be that high is a different story. The optimization does indeed prolly suck, but you can't act like you weren't informed of what the specs you'd need were; it's right there on the store page.
Asking someone if they meet minimum specs is the first step in troubleshooting any performance issue.