Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
What do you do with Garrus from Mass Effect (to just take one example from that series), and the millions of people who romanced him and have genuinely fallen in love with the character, yet don't consider themselves furries? You might say "alien", but it's only a label. In concept, there's no difference between a dinosaur on two legs with human intelligence (Garrus), and a random wolf on two legs with human intelligence (Blaidd from Elden Ring). Garrus might even look less human than most furry designs I've seen, that ain't stopping his legion of fangirls.
Same question with the Dragonborns from Baldur's Gate 3. Wouldn't make your Dragonborn romance any of the main characters also make them "zoophiles" in return with your logic? Do you wanna go ahead and call most of the Larian fanbase zoophiles while you're at it?
What about Link in Zelda Breath of The Wild? Officially, he was infatuated with a Zora, and they're just naked fish people. Is Link, the reflection of the player, a zoophile now?
What do you do with Beauty & The Beast? The Shape of Water?
Use common sense. An actual animal is not human, while a furry is as much an animal as a human is, it's a human in a different skin, with the same intelligence, belonging to the same society/type of society, with the same abilities. It's not zoophilia, it's more like xenophilia. You can have problems with it, but whatever you call it, it's already normalised.
To take Mass Effect 1 again, you sound like Ashley before her character arc with her "I can't tell the aliens from the animals."
That would make you just as bad, lmao.
- Poison themselves with alcohol in social gatherings
- Destroy their attention span via social media/fast media
- Absolutely melt their joints in sports like Farlek, padel or crossfeet
- Game hours on end without small breaks in between, causing many issues like gamer wrists, bad posture, etc
- Destroy savings by consuming unnecessary useless products that society tells us to get.
I believe been socially awkward is one of the lesser issues with what people do in their free time. From experience most people that join the furry community do so because they met someone nice within them that "got them to talk".
You may like dragonborn or Garrus but that's not the same as "loving" animals, there is no community that dresses like Garrus, dragonborn or that fish from Zelda, cosplayers can dress up as their favorite characters but they don't have animal frenzy, while furries are often chosen as prototypes of real creatures, which is connected with perverse thoughts towards animals.
The logic doesn't hold up.
You think people that dress up as space marines for 40k want to ♥♥♥♥ em? No. Grow up.
If you don't see it, it doesn't mean it's not there, the point is that you can't ♥♥♥♥ a space marine, because they don't exist unlike animals.
There's people cosplaying the American presidents, you think they want a piece of em?
There's people cosplaying as fridges, boxes and construction equipment, some very elaborate forklifts, do they want to go wild with them?
There's people cosplaying as the average WoW master gamer, do you think people want to distract them mid raid?
Grow up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmULc5VANsw
Space marines are too good of a role models for that.
well, where is it? you have the burden of proof - you made a claim, now you gotta supply the evidence.
everyone can just say something hbullshit like "the moon landing wasn't faked because the moon isn't real". doesn't mean we have to believe them.
as someone making a claim like "all furries are zoophiles" it falls to the claim maker to supply us with foolproof evidence. otherwise you're just gonna look like an ignorant child.