Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
However, I haven't been able to find the source of that statement again. The best I can find now is that the game will take players to a whole new world, which is a bit ambiguous. For players who are familiar with the first to games it could mean that 4546B will not be used. For first-time players of the franchise it could just mean that the game will not take place on Earth.
Speaking for myself, I would prefer a new planet (not 4546b). I have played both Subnautica games, and I would like to a fresh slate, unencumbered and unconstrained. For me, the greatest attraction is the experience of something completely new.
And, frankly, we have seen how much trouble the developers had when they decided to re-use lore and plot elements from Subnautica in Subnautica: Below Zero.
The response succinctly answers the question, it's fine. Why get affronted over nothing?
That's about as concise and perfect an answer as he could have given. Not sure what you're taking issue with.
They answered the question perfectly, clear answer nothing left to be confused about.
Stop complaining for the sake of complaining