Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
My logic was that of literally 2000s games, nothing advanced. I wonder what is the special thing that I may think about that is possible and not directly something you have to do to progress xD
EDIT: Apparently, in 99% of cases, shooting a grenade will do nothing. The only way to shoot it and make it explode would be to hit the detonator to start the normal chain-reaction leading to the explosion.
which means we need a chain cutter or idk what to call (and the symbols changed on my keyboard does anyone know how to fix this i cant find the question mark)
While I would normally agree, in the very same game you can explode a barrel of gunpowder by shooting it, which is also not how it works in real life. So then it just gives the game a lack of consistency.
Interesting. I didn't locate the gunpowder. Also, I completely agree with others who posted regarding video game logic implying shooting something to blow it up being common practice. I do kind of hope the full product allows for shooting a tripwire grenade to detonate it. I'm with you in that I like consistency, logic or not.