Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But is the reverse true? Can you learn something without teaching others a thing or two?
I think I would give the same answer as HighLanderPony, in a vacuum (as a teacher myself). The idea is when you think about how to teach something, not only do you have to understand the subject well (and even more) you have to think about how it will be received. Basically, the effort you've put into the lesson makes it stick.
Though, it could mean something else in a specific context. In that sense, it could also be a play on the expression (there are a few of them in the game, I recall).
Of course it's meant to be seen as the ultimate truth - else, why put the effort into writing and voice acting it? Why immortalize Shakespeare's words but no in reverse? I'm just trying to figure out if there is truth in the inverse statement.
Is a lesson learned, a lesson taught? By learning a lesson, have I taught someone a lesson? I'm super aware of the philosophy that if you teach something you often wind up learning or having to know the material well, but I'm really interested in the opposite statement.
Is a lesson learned, a lesson taught?
Where else would I do it? It's a quote from this videogame, I think it's entirely valid to discuss quotes from darkest dungeon 2 in a darkest dungeon 2 forum. I find it super interesting that you spend so much time trying to question the question instead of answering it. Instead of trying to do that, I'd rather see you try to defend the inverse statement. I'm well aware of the "blue pill" interpretation of well in order to teach it requires more knowledge and sometimes you get taught more lessons, but I'm much more interested in exploring the unknown of
Is a lesson learned, a lesson taught? Can you give some cool interpretation of this angle rather than the forward angle?
Leaving that aside, why would I defend any specific statement? I haven't made any claims, I have nothing to defend.
No no no, I already understand that perspective. I want to hear the inverse proposition. I want to hear someone defend the inverse.
Is a lesson learned, a lesson taught?
Why? Just for your entertainment?