Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
the game works for me most of the time but its so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ held together
Same game and updates, but different PC setups.
Everyone have to look into their pc and see if there is things to do;
bios update, drivers on MB, sound drivers like realtek, KB/M drivers, headphone drivers and win update.
Then you have the virtual memory (sys file) that this game uses above 24 000 MB in ground War. You need to have + 35-45 GB free space on sysdisc (C:) for this.
Then you have settings in bios this game dont like; xmp and hypertreading other then auto. and then you have power supply and temps to consider.
A 3070ti need a min of 750w PSU. A 40 series need even more, according to another post in the forum.
I fix both fps drops and later startupcrash - game crash after weeks of testing.
Did you hear a whooshing noise?
Because that was the point going right over your head lol
First off, I don’t think the game working for hundreds of thousands of people is just “some” - kind of feels like the majority to me.
Secondly, clearly whatever issue you’re having is not something baked into the game - if it was, EVERYONE would be experiencing it.
Thirdly, aside from true technical issues universally shared by all owners of a game, 9 times out of 10 when a game fails to work its due to user error. That user error could be anything from a botched install, to your PC being riddled with viruses and other things corrupting files or messing with your hardware/software, to attempting to run the game with settings not appropriate for your hardware, to faulty hardware, and so on and so on.
Fact is - the source of your problem isn’t the game, it’s something on your end.
So, what did we learn?
1. If you want to comment on something, read what other people have said first
2. Don't feel like you did anything by saying it is someone else's fault and defend a bad dev team.
Guess what the fact is? You are wrong, dumb, and your whole comment is worthless in every way.
It's also funny how you would say "hundreds of thousands" as if you know exact numbers when you can hardly count past 10. You don't know if it works for everyone, and making the assumption just makes you look worse than you actually are. People can very easily not post their problem because this is 1 game out of many. Could literally play anything else that has developers constantly fixing bugs and assuring nothing game breaking exist. Even siege, which has a garbage dev team, is better than CoD.
You defend a company that does all of this? And you are COMPLETELY wrong in every way.
You are not a developer. You probably don't even know half of the bugs and game breaking issues existed so far in just this ONE game. Did you even play the beta? Did you not see how many things existed in that that caused people issues? A ton of people couldn't even play or had such bad fps that it was impossible to enjoy. And the "it was just a beta" excuse is invalid because those are things seen in an alpha not beta. Beta means they are pretty much done and wanted to showcase the game. Alpha is when they are still working out the bugs and figuring out the path for the game, so this game is still in alpha imo. Every CoD is in alpha until the end of it's life cycle because they cannot seem to figure out how to fix any bugs so that it is a smooth game for all and they cannot decide what to do with certain modes, guns, or mechanics.
You are just a fanboy for CoD and you probably would eat their left overs if they told you they want you too like a good little fanboy. Disgusting.
Nowadays CoD is bad. That is a fact. The older CoDs would very very rarely have an update like 1.01 or 1.02. Those would be called patches, not updates. They would go from 1.0 to 1.1 and so on. Now, CoD calls 1.016 an update. You know why? When a game gets past 1.0, that looks bad. That shows that the initial release was not good enough and required one or more updates to perfect it. So a 1.016 update has new maps and new guns + the microtransactions that are overpriced. Back in the old CoDs, an update was a new map pack or a LARGE fix of bugs, glitches, etc. We went from the devs perfecting the game to the devs monetizing the game in large amounts in small "patches" that they call updates. That is sad.
yes, the game works for hundreds of thousands of people, but have you noticed that the majority of that number is on console, i assume you know that activision's main focus is console, smallest bugs get fixed on that because they gotta keep milking money out of ps4 children
now the pc playerbase, that's you and me and everyone else, and if you were telling me you haven't experienced a single issue with this game you'd be full of ♥♥♥♥, how many discussions and reviews mention the game doesn't start? and that some files don't validate? game constantly crashing and all these issues you think are problems on one person's pc when it's really hundreds if not thousands of pc players experiencing these issues