Undergarments

[YouAreNowReadingMyVeryLongName]

Am I the only one bothered that the undergarments are still visible when wearing armor. If this was intentional I can accept it but then I checked the Bandit Loincloth(Kemono-path) has it's own undergarment too, so why did they bother adding that on top of the already existing default. If anyone is wondering how it looks since all undergarments have you wearing a short or pants, when using the gear I mentioned it looks like you wore an underwear on top of the shorts/pants. Could this be a bug or a lazy censorship?

[Grimzy]

i mean....undergarments dont dissapear, its actually more realistic this way.

[YouAreNowReadingMyVeryLongName]

Originally posted by Grimzy:

i mean....undergarments dont dissapear, its actually more realistic this way.

Well as I pointed out having an underwear that was part of the armor design on top of an undergarment doesn't seem quite realistic. I haven't seen all the sets yet but so far the Ninja and Bandit set seem to look weird with the undergarments.

[Aeden]

Could just be a design oversight. Like offering large body tattoos and then covering them up with said undergarments & armor.

If its not fixed officially, I suspect modders will take care of it once they figure out the game's engine.

[Todd]

No you're not the only one bothered by it. I'm at the point I get angry every time I see them because they ruin so many good armor just seeing them poking through or clipping with the armor. It has to be some intentional last second thing they were forced to throw in, what's the worst is that they don't even have a minimalist combo between the chest wraps and the shorts, which makes it feel like a spiteful thing that was added to intentionally ruin a lot of the armor.