Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Nope, I want them to do a Med III or an Empire II though.
Are you sure you want *this* CA to make one of those?
apprently there are other total wars in development still and going ahead with them despite the lay offs that are going to happen.
Why, is that what you want to happen?
That's assuming the DLC's aren't lazy reskins designed to meet bare-minimum obligations. If they could cancel 3Kingdoms, the most successful TW launch by far, why would they put full support behind the WORST TW launch ever (yes, even worse than Britannia by ~4x).
It's an $80 CAD purchase that doesn't have GeForce Now support, I don't see why I should switch away from Warhammer 2 and 3Kingdoms.
Saying someone can only criticize a game they've actually played is ludicrous.