Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Of course not. I am just surprised people would choose to drive Opel Vectra 2002 having BMW M2 2018 in the garage next to it.
Yeah, i spent 100 h in EA alone.
With BG3 vs DATV it's not even that close a comparison given that DATV is an ARPG now. I loved BG3 but the moment-to-moment turn based gameplay eventually gets a bit rote, especially since most of the harder fights are now 'solved problems' (eg cheesing Raphael).
In any case, it's a world I've not been back to in, what, a decade? It's nice to revisit the setting.
I'll admit a lot of that time I was offtab, but that applies to all games I play ... nevertheless, I've still completed it as half elf, half-drow, drow, Astarion, Gale, Karlach, and got half way through act 3 as high elf and a modded Asaimar, you get the gist.
Impresive, in that case, I can understand. You are RPG veteran so you just look for RPG to play. But since you played 2k hours in BG 3 you are right person to tell me if DA Veilguard really feels bad compared to it? What I mean precisly is storytelling and how well dialogues and characters are written. Do game keep you engaged? Or you play it just because there is nothing better at the time?
It`s way more linear.
And all is solved only with combat.
Way less party interractions.
But it`s fast paced, lot of things happening.
You visit more areas and they are more beautifull then in any other previous game.
Yeah you basically nailed the issue I am trying to get answer to with mixed result so far. : D
Maybe my question was formed in wrong way and that led into some confusion I see that appeared here.
I do not deny that you can buy two games and play two games. What I am asking is if there is any reason to buy new Dragon Age when there is Baldurs Gate 3. And no, buying "because you can", "because they are not exclusionary" is not good enough argument for me to spend money. I want good product. The meaning of this question was to ask about Dragon Age Veilguard quality, dismiss some possible myths that always appear due to both sides propaganda of success and failure and then at the end decide if game is worth buying. I won't buy game only because it's RPG or because it's Dragon Age or because I have nothing else to play. But I will buy game that is same or better quality that other game I enjoyed in the past represented.
I hope that helps.
It sounds like what you're really asking is for a reason why you should consider buying the game when what you regard as a superior alternative exists. And no one can answer that but you. Obviously if it's not a game you see value in, you shouldn't buy it.